1
That CAN'T be true! / Re: Big Bang Theory - How the BBT really works?
« on: 07/11/2020 11:58:29 »
The second law implies that the useable energy of the universe has to decrease with time, since entropy has to increase and an increase in entropy absorbs energy. The energy is conserved, but not in a fully reusable form, The 100,00 scientists who study the universe leave this out. I question their theories since law supersedes theory.
The implication of the second law is there is a pool of dead energy forming, that has energy value but is tied up into entropy and is thereof not fully reusable by the universe. This means the universe cannot go on forever, since the second law implies the increasing entropy will eventually cause the universe to run out of useable energy.
One big problem is since light travels faster than matter, the signals may not express the impact of the growing dead pool energy on the matter that the energy represents due to the amount of time delay between the two.
Another question one may ask is the observed red shift due to motion or the movement of energy into the dead pool, or both? Red shifted energy causes the original energy to lower energy value in a way where some of the original energy is made unusable to the universe.
For example. if I was to start with a cylinder of compressed gas at temperature T, and allowed it to expand out of the cylinder, the gas and cylinder will get colder as entropy increases. This will show up as red shift in IR spectrum, even if the cylinder remains stationary and the gas is in motion way below relativistic speeds. We can retrieve the gas and compress it to restore the heat; reverse the entropy, but that will take work and increase entropy even mor for a net gain of dead pool energy and a net loss of reusable universal energy.
How does cosmology factor in dead pool energy? If it does not, why not? Without this consideration any theory would be flawed. Dead pool energy obeys energy conservation and the second law, with these two laws higher than any theory.
The implication of the second law is there is a pool of dead energy forming, that has energy value but is tied up into entropy and is thereof not fully reusable by the universe. This means the universe cannot go on forever, since the second law implies the increasing entropy will eventually cause the universe to run out of useable energy.
One big problem is since light travels faster than matter, the signals may not express the impact of the growing dead pool energy on the matter that the energy represents due to the amount of time delay between the two.
Another question one may ask is the observed red shift due to motion or the movement of energy into the dead pool, or both? Red shifted energy causes the original energy to lower energy value in a way where some of the original energy is made unusable to the universe.
For example. if I was to start with a cylinder of compressed gas at temperature T, and allowed it to expand out of the cylinder, the gas and cylinder will get colder as entropy increases. This will show up as red shift in IR spectrum, even if the cylinder remains stationary and the gas is in motion way below relativistic speeds. We can retrieve the gas and compress it to restore the heat; reverse the entropy, but that will take work and increase entropy even mor for a net gain of dead pool energy and a net loss of reusable universal energy.
How does cosmology factor in dead pool energy? If it does not, why not? Without this consideration any theory would be flawed. Dead pool energy obeys energy conservation and the second law, with these two laws higher than any theory.
The following users thanked this post: otisons