141
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: What is TIME?
« on: 01/10/2021 19:54:53 »TIME is just The Internal Motion of Everything.Nope, that's motion.
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
TIME is just The Internal Motion of Everything.Nope, that's motion.
Otherwise the fact that mass increases to infinite along with the energy required is based on math and theory is it?Just a theory indicates you don't understand what a theory is. In layman's terms you can equate theory as meaning fact. There have many thousands of experiments (CERN is one) that shows relativity is correct.
Plus as the speed of light a mass would not be affected by time?It is not possible for matter to move at the speed of light, so the question is moot.
That's a pity that human can see the BOOK from the side.Personally I am glad you can see books from the side, otherwise depending on a books orientation it could be invisible. I have enough trouble loosing things as it is.
To break all it I had to fight with the Satan (666)In a fight like that are there a clear set of rules or is it more like a street fight? And if there are rules, can you trust Satan to follow the rules?
change knowledge with Lucifer (661)Was that a classroom type setting or was it more like a late night loaded dorm setting?
I was lucky to be supported by the God of the galaxy (222)I'll say!! Think if you got the God of Galaxy IC 3104 (that guy's a goof!), the God of galaxy 222 has to be way better than him.
Is the Soul made of dark matter?This is the type of absurd tripe that makes it very (I'm talking VERY) hard to believe that you have a PhD in physics. I guess it is possible that you have a PhD in physics and then had a traumatic brain injury, which if true, I am sorry that happened to you.
We don't see Souls.
OK, you get in the rocket and go to Mars without faith in science. Either that means your hoping or suicidal.That is a just a semantic argument.
Is it a fake tan or a medical/liver condition or does he consume tooIt's his makeup, why he wants to be orange is beyond me.
much beta carotene, in carrots or pumpkin, or orange peel!?
My role model is Eternal Student/ES, who is always polite.ES is a gem no doubt, I on the other hand, am an old curmudgeon. [shrug]
Or as I like to say "U can always rely up/on ES, for a thoughtful reply".
It could be somebody young, or old, or not a real fizzy cyst/scientist, so why be rude, to them.I have been reading and and responding to PPs posts for maybe 5 years and my patience with his tripe has worn EXCEEDINGLY thin over that time.
What have U got against poor PP, Origin?I have nothing against him, I don't even know him and have never met him. I have a lot of problems with his posts which are typically made up, pseudoscience crap.
We all will find out sooner or later one way or the other.I doubt that. We won't 'find out' anything cause we will be dead.
Do Identical Twins Have the Same Handwriting ?No.
and if not..........why not ?They are different people.
Attached is a pdf file with an article proposing the existence of a quantum-type process that would be responsible for gravitational phenomenon.This is a discussion forum so it would be best if you discussed your point here. I don't want to download your paper but if you state the main points or a single point in your paper, I may want to discuss it with you.
The information there is straightforward and understandable.And complete bollocks.
Attached file: NonStandard-thinking.zip [Downloaded 0 times].It looks like the file didn't link properly.
The dust particles ("elemental ether units" in my Michelson Morley analogy) are inertially insignificant relative to the motion of the car (photon.) MMX had been searching for a more readily-detectable interaction than that, in their assumption about how interaction with an ether medium would influence the passage of a light beam.The ether was what use to be thought of as the medium for light. That is the light waves were transmitted through the ether, just like water waves are transmitted through water.
Now I see the problem the coming into existence at the very start is as the big bang theory so this is matter that is not living and therefore it is dead. Then the thinking / conscious universe is the second state coming into being so the dead but existing universe began to develop into a conscious entity.Why is this in new theories? This clearly is not a theory or a hypothesis, this is a wag at best. This should be moved to 'that can't be true'.
I didn't say that electrons are not "natural." -What I tried to convey is that electrons appeared cosmically in natural settings, whereas muons, bosons, quarks, etc. are units that have been found under artificial technological settings (Physics Lab, accelerator/collider)That statement is wrong. The photons from the sun are bosons; do think those are 'not natural'? All subatomic particles are natural. Again you should be asking questions about physics if you are interested, not making random false statements.
in my Model, all quantum units have been originally formed starting from elemental ether unitsThat is just something you made up with zero evidence.
A universal underlying vibratory ether preceded a later creationally-designed superimposed quantum dynamic. In my Creation model, electrons were the key units creationally projected, toward an ether region, in order to chain-reactionally produce our quantum world of electrons, protons, neutrons, and atoms. -As electrons coursed through the ether, their vibrations aligned the vibrations of the elemental ether units, ,which in turn caused them to entrain with each other, which is how larger units like quantum units and atoms originally were formed, in what I referred to as a "natural" cosmic process to distinguish it from those units found using accelerator/colliders.That is just gibberish with some 'sciency' sounding words. It is meaningless.
The electron I was referring to would be the kind physicists find occurring naturallyWell that shouldn't be a problem since every single electron is naturally occurring.
and is the smallest one found occurring naturallyThis also shouldn't be a problem since all electrons are the same size.
This "natural" group of energic units does not include so-called "particle units," like muons, bosons, and the like) produced in laboratory procedures or with accelerator/collider procedures.)Again this should be easy since bosons and muons are not electrons.
In my ether-based modelYou don't have a model.
Ho despises and ridicules atheists and for what reason?It is just a post by a deranged serial troll named Dennis Markuze, pay him no mind.
If there was no repulsive energy then we would fall into the black hole or on the sun. So yes there is energy that pushes us as much as gravity attracts usFirst, I think you are doing pretty well with your use of English.