Show Posts
1
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Is it possible to alter the frequency on different forms of "lightspeed" waves?
« on: 28/10/2012 01:43:25 »
I'm presently watching a scientifical tv program ("The world's best telescopes"), which began talking about VLT - "Very Large Telescope" (apparently the world's biggest optical instrument 
) which is sometimes used to detect :0 8 black holes 8 :0 .
The technique, used for detection, seems to have something to do with infra-red (<= but infra)light and it was said to be necessary to set up the telescope in a place with dry air, like a desert. The reason for that was that moist air filters infra-red light.
Anyway, that led me to wonder if it would be possible to view infra-red light waves with the naked eye, provided that one could increase their frequency.
Maybe the inventors of night binoculars already solved that problem, what do I know?
My other question
(sorry :I ) belongs to the same context: is it possible to lower the speed on "lightspeed waves", except for running them through water (quite effectively though)?
I wonder what would happen, if one could slow down those "lightspeed waves" into being completely still and in harmony with themselves. Would that make time freeze too?
Maybe the wave would turn into a permanent particle or an object?
8D
I have similar thought about temperature in conjunction with time, since I've read somewhere that movement and temperature go hand in hand.
For instance, water molecules move faster, boiling than being cold.
My suggestion was that, if you lower the temperature and movement (to the temperature on say the "planet" Pluto), then the molecules will slow down and maybe also time.
Right or wrong?
Oops, that was at least three questions.
Pardonnez-moi.
Finally, I'd like to point out, that the term: "the speed of light" is misleading, since clearly not only light travels with that particular speed.
My suggestion to you bright people out there and in charge: change the name to something more appropriate and general..."asap".
Even terms like: "the speed of radio" or "the speed of microwaves" would be a bad idea.
Somebody here had better fix the "smiley problem" too. Obviously smileys aren't visible in the text. Why is that?
) which is sometimes used to detect :0 8 black holes 8 :0 .The technique, used for detection, seems to have something to do with infra-red (<= but infra)light and it was said to be necessary to set up the telescope in a place with dry air, like a desert. The reason for that was that moist air filters infra-red light.
Anyway, that led me to wonder if it would be possible to view infra-red light waves with the naked eye, provided that one could increase their frequency.
Maybe the inventors of night binoculars already solved that problem, what do I know?
My other question
(sorry :I ) belongs to the same context: is it possible to lower the speed on "lightspeed waves", except for running them through water (quite effectively though)?
I wonder what would happen, if one could slow down those "lightspeed waves" into being completely still and in harmony with themselves. Would that make time freeze too?
Maybe the wave would turn into a permanent particle or an object?
8D
I have similar thought about temperature in conjunction with time, since I've read somewhere that movement and temperature go hand in hand.
For instance, water molecules move faster, boiling than being cold.
My suggestion was that, if you lower the temperature and movement (to the temperature on say the "planet" Pluto), then the molecules will slow down and maybe also time.
Right or wrong?
Oops, that was at least three questions.
Pardonnez-moi.
Finally, I'd like to point out, that the term: "the speed of light" is misleading, since clearly not only light travels with that particular speed.
My suggestion to you bright people out there and in charge: change the name to something more appropriate and general..."asap".
Even terms like: "the speed of radio" or "the speed of microwaves" would be a bad idea.
Somebody here had better fix the "smiley problem" too. Obviously smileys aren't visible in the text. Why is that?