1
New Theories / Dark Motion. Is it the answer to the Dark Matter and Dark energy problem
« on: 11/08/2023 16:01:52 »
This is a discovery I made many years ago. I think you will find it a challenge to your beliefs. It is not a theory, it does not violate Newton's basic axioms too much and of course you can replicate the experiment very easily.
[ Invalid Attachment ]
Dark Motion
The diagram shows a blue ball traveling at a velocity of A-C, which is struck by a red ball traveling at a velocity of B-C.
The Blue ball is deflected with a resultant velocity C-D, the vector change is solely of direction, the red ball comes to rest its vector change is solely of magnitude.
That is all there is to see. A diagram that illustrates Newton?s equal and opposite force and momentum change. X is the difference between the orthodox view and reality.
That is the simple part, describing Dark Motion.
Newton's laws of motion have served as the foundation for the development of further concepts, including those of symmetry and reversibility in physics, which are considered to be inviolate.
Dark Motion is neither symmetrical nor reversible. The diagram clearly shows this.
That is the discovery. Now for some speculation
Dark Motion is a natural phenomenon therefore it should appear in nature. Dark matter and dark energy are two examples where Dark Motion provides plausible solutions. It also offers tantalising glimpses of a unified theory by moving classical theory closer to quantum mechanics.
A practical use for an engineered version would be an Internally Reacted Thruster. A device that exerts constant force in one direction.
An IRT would consist of a motor and the reacting parts and would produce thrust proportional to the mass of the active elements and operation speed.
An important characteristic of the IRT stems from the fact that work done is force over distance, If the IRT does not move a load then it does not consume any power. For instance, hovering would only consume ?no load? power.
Fit an IRT in place of wheels to give vectored thrust for a flying car
Replace the rocket in a spaceship, take the wings off planes and replace the fuel hungry jet engines with electric motors. Float ocean cargo vessels over land, Cruise ships to the Grand Canyon. Every city could have an overhead platform for emergency vehicles and communication aerials.
No doubt you will think of your own applications Skiing? Sailing? Gliding?
One final thought, lifting massive loads. The IRT would act like a hydraulic jack, just lifting the load off the ground. Effectively that is anti-gravity. As the earth is rotating, the fully equipped orbital station would not be held on the surface by gravity, just held in place by the IRTs until the earth rotated away. Like a slingshot.
I originally wrote this for my Grandchildren.
I am quite jealous to think that when you are Grandparents all this will be mundane and uses of Dark Motion that I cannot imagine will be commonplace.
Your loving Grandfather, Brian.
The twin pendulum model that you played with many years ago is just a convenient way of demonstrating this.
[ Invalid Attachment ]
Dark Motion
The diagram shows a blue ball traveling at a velocity of A-C, which is struck by a red ball traveling at a velocity of B-C.
The Blue ball is deflected with a resultant velocity C-D, the vector change is solely of direction, the red ball comes to rest its vector change is solely of magnitude.
That is all there is to see. A diagram that illustrates Newton?s equal and opposite force and momentum change. X is the difference between the orthodox view and reality.
That is the simple part, describing Dark Motion.
Newton's laws of motion have served as the foundation for the development of further concepts, including those of symmetry and reversibility in physics, which are considered to be inviolate.
Dark Motion is neither symmetrical nor reversible. The diagram clearly shows this.
That is the discovery. Now for some speculation
Dark Motion is a natural phenomenon therefore it should appear in nature. Dark matter and dark energy are two examples where Dark Motion provides plausible solutions. It also offers tantalising glimpses of a unified theory by moving classical theory closer to quantum mechanics.
A practical use for an engineered version would be an Internally Reacted Thruster. A device that exerts constant force in one direction.
An IRT would consist of a motor and the reacting parts and would produce thrust proportional to the mass of the active elements and operation speed.
An important characteristic of the IRT stems from the fact that work done is force over distance, If the IRT does not move a load then it does not consume any power. For instance, hovering would only consume ?no load? power.
Fit an IRT in place of wheels to give vectored thrust for a flying car
Replace the rocket in a spaceship, take the wings off planes and replace the fuel hungry jet engines with electric motors. Float ocean cargo vessels over land, Cruise ships to the Grand Canyon. Every city could have an overhead platform for emergency vehicles and communication aerials.
No doubt you will think of your own applications Skiing? Sailing? Gliding?
One final thought, lifting massive loads. The IRT would act like a hydraulic jack, just lifting the load off the ground. Effectively that is anti-gravity. As the earth is rotating, the fully equipped orbital station would not be held on the surface by gravity, just held in place by the IRTs until the earth rotated away. Like a slingshot.
I originally wrote this for my Grandchildren.
I am quite jealous to think that when you are Grandparents all this will be mundane and uses of Dark Motion that I cannot imagine will be commonplace.
Your loving Grandfather, Brian.
The twin pendulum model that you played with many years ago is just a convenient way of demonstrating this.