1
New Theories / why is Absolute Zero ignored in the creation/end of the Universe
« on: 23/08/2020 12:31:38 »
Absolute Zero AZ
(why is it ignored )?
My question is simple enough because as you can tell I'm not a scientist I would like to know why ultracold and its effects on the universe are never seriously included in theories. It occurred to that that If we consider AZ for a moment, we could imagine what happens at the end, when all the Energy/Matter has been used up in the Universe. (through countless expansions and contractions...if you believe that theory).
The only thing that can reasonable exist is Absolute Zero (AZ) the default setting...literally absolute zero energy/matter, absolute zero gravity and AZ temperature -273.15
Is it a stretch to presume therefore, that prior to the Big Bang (BB) that the universe was in the same state...default setting?
So the history of our Universe would now look like:-
AZ – BB – Expansion/Contraction – AZ
This then raises the question where did all the Energy/Matter for the BB come from?
A question like, can Energy/Matter be created in AZ?
A possible answer could be a variation in temperature that occurred on a miniscule level. Perhaps, a kind of condensation, that allowed for the creation of building blocks for quark or such.
To find this phenomenon we would have to search within Planck's Length 1.6 x 10^35 crossed at AZ plus variant in temperature.
Imagine then if enough Energy were created throughout the empty space then an imbalance might occur perhaps gravity then a violent contraction which could lead to the BB
The new history of our Universe would look like :-
AZ – Molecule Creation – Imbalance - BB – Expansion/Contraction - AZ
Another consideration is that this model allows for a completely depleted Universe to start again and again. And that a new Universe could come into existence simultaneously outside the realms of our Universe, i f you believe that theory.
At present the Big Bang (BB) is the theory that explains the origins of our Universe, but what if this is only part of the story, only a point in time that we can measure from. Perhaps we can imagine something different.
Is all this rubbish, please confirm my ignorance thankyou
(why is it ignored )?
My question is simple enough because as you can tell I'm not a scientist I would like to know why ultracold and its effects on the universe are never seriously included in theories. It occurred to that that If we consider AZ for a moment, we could imagine what happens at the end, when all the Energy/Matter has been used up in the Universe. (through countless expansions and contractions...if you believe that theory).
The only thing that can reasonable exist is Absolute Zero (AZ) the default setting...literally absolute zero energy/matter, absolute zero gravity and AZ temperature -273.15
Is it a stretch to presume therefore, that prior to the Big Bang (BB) that the universe was in the same state...default setting?
So the history of our Universe would now look like:-
AZ – BB – Expansion/Contraction – AZ
This then raises the question where did all the Energy/Matter for the BB come from?
A question like, can Energy/Matter be created in AZ?
A possible answer could be a variation in temperature that occurred on a miniscule level. Perhaps, a kind of condensation, that allowed for the creation of building blocks for quark or such.
To find this phenomenon we would have to search within Planck's Length 1.6 x 10^35 crossed at AZ plus variant in temperature.
Imagine then if enough Energy were created throughout the empty space then an imbalance might occur perhaps gravity then a violent contraction which could lead to the BB
The new history of our Universe would look like :-
AZ – Molecule Creation – Imbalance - BB – Expansion/Contraction - AZ
Another consideration is that this model allows for a completely depleted Universe to start again and again. And that a new Universe could come into existence simultaneously outside the realms of our Universe, i f you believe that theory.
At present the Big Bang (BB) is the theory that explains the origins of our Universe, but what if this is only part of the story, only a point in time that we can measure from. Perhaps we can imagine something different.
Is all this rubbish, please confirm my ignorance thankyou