61
New Theories / Re: Chaos theory, Butterfly and Lorenz Attractor, Butterfly effect, Mystery
« on: 26/09/2023 21:45:28 »The man's name is LORENZ and not LORENTZ
You are of course right. Thank you for drawing attention to this circumstance.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The man's name is LORENZ and not LORENTZ
infinity?
But there is a bigger multiverse, isn't there, of many universes. Is the process of universes going in and out of existence, infinite and eternal?
He said that gigaevolution is not limited to biological process. In other words, it's the superset of biological process.
Have you found actual evidence that the correct extent to which the mind is involved is not, in fact, zero?
Can you show it's not just some thing you made up?
What's the difference between gigaevolution and biological megaevolution possess ?
I don't see what your thread has to do with science.
If butterfly's could start hurricane's, there would be a lot more hurricanes as the butterfly's badly outnumber the swirly windy big sky circle's. If were talking one butterfly, what's the difference in that butterfly's flight then other's? that he causes a hurricane?
He arbitrarily decided to use a butterfly in his example, but he could have used anything else if he wanted to and it would have been just as relevant.
Any Thoughts on the Domino Effect?
Are you an idiot, or do you realise that in the 1960s he wouldn't have had a computer that could plot- and a magazine wouldn't have published- a 3D image?
So the fact that the Lorentz attractor somewhat resembles a butterfly has no correlation to the butterfly effect.
Incidentally, the Lorenz attractor is a 3 D shape and it only looks "like a butterfly" from one direction.
It's just coincidence.