The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Uranus, Neptune, Kuiper Belt !..They Should not be there ?..so why ?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Uranus, Neptune, Kuiper Belt !..They Should not be there ?..so why ?

  • 2 Replies
  • 11033 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline neilep (OP)

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21211
  • Activity:
    1%
  • Thanked: 119 times
Uranus, Neptune, Kuiper Belt !..They Should not be there ?..so why ?
« on: 17/03/2008 14:24:11 »
Dear Planetologists,

See these planets ?

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

Uranus & Neptune (oh yes and iddy biddy earthy werthy)


and  this Solar System Trouser Tightner !!

 [ Invalid Attachment ]



Apparently....these objects should not be there ?...they are too big ?.....did i hear right ?.....if I did !!...why are they there then if they should not be ?......do we need to tell them off for being norty planets and norty small bodies ! ?


hugs & Shmishes

xxxxxxxx








* urneperth.jpg (37.15 kB, 410x211 - viewed 4791 times.)

* kuiper_belt.gif (25.7 kB, 400x298 - viewed 11937 times.)
« Last Edit: 22/03/2008 18:11:10 by chris »
Logged
Men are the same as Women, just inside out !
 



Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3389
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Re: Uranus, Neptune, Kuiper Belt !..They Should not be there ?..so why ?
« Reply #1 on: 17/03/2008 19:19:22 »
Why do you (or others) say they shouldn't be there?

Let me answer my question.  Planetary systems are likely to be disrupted by stars passing nearby in their orbits around the centre of the galaxy so the solar system must not have had too many close encounters with stars during its life.  The solar system also includes the Oort cloud which is outside of the Kuiper belt from which most of the comets originate.

Most people do not realise how widely separated most stars are and the probability of a close encounter is extremely low.  In the past it was considered that spiral arms in galaxies were areas of increased density and the sun experienced higher risks of close encounters every few hundred million years as it passed through them but that may not be entirely true nowadays they are understood to be more like shock waves where the supernovae resulting from short lived high mass stars spawn the condensation more stars from cold gas in front of them as they orbit. So the stellar density is not too great here it is just that they contain bright young stars and are more visible.
« Last Edit: 18/03/2008 09:26:46 by Soul Surfer »
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 

Offline neilep (OP)

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21211
  • Activity:
    1%
  • Thanked: 119 times
Re: Uranus, Neptune, Kuiper Belt !..They Should not be there ?..so why ?
« Reply #2 on: 17/03/2008 19:30:44 »
Quote from: Soul Surfer on 17/03/2008 19:19:22
Why do you (or others) say they shouldn't be there? I Don't say this Ian....well..I'm reporting what I heard but I'm not stating a fact!!..hence the question

Let me answer my question.  Planetary systems are likely to be disrupted by stars passing nearby in their orbits around the centre of the galaxy so the solar system must not have had too many close encounters with stars during its life.  The solar system also includes the Oort cloud which is outside of the Kuiper belt from which most of the comets. originate.

Most people do not realise how widely separated most stars are and the probability of a close encounter is extremely slow.  In the past it was considered that spiral arms in galaxies were areas of increased density and the sun experienced higher risks of close encounters every few hundred million years as it passed through them but that may not be entirely true nowadays they are understood to be more like shock waves where the supernovae resulting from short lived high mass stars spawn the condensation more stars from cold gas in front of them as they orbit. So the stellar density is not too great here it is just that they contain bright young stars and are more visible.




THANK YOU IAN.
Logged
Men are the same as Women, just inside out !
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.532 seconds with 30 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.