The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. The Environment
  4. Could green energy sources actually compromise nature?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Could green energy sources actually compromise nature?

  • 2 Replies
  • 6967 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Richard Brown

  • Guest
Could green energy sources actually compromise nature?
« on: 15/07/2008 23:32:05 »
Richard Brown asked the Naked Scientists:

Hi Chris,

Just been listening to the podcast 'Olympic Science' and about the 'Anaconda' tube and I started to think about the various methods we've invented to convert natural forces into energy (wind farms, wave farms, etc).

As, when it comes to energy, there is no free lunch, are we sapping nature of its energy? If so, what could be the repercussions in the many years to come?

Keep up the good work.
Richard

What do you think?
« Last Edit: 16/07/2008 09:48:18 by chris »
Logged
 



Marked as best answer by on 07/07/2025 15:14:32

Offline bryan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 19
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Undo Best Answer
  • Could green energy sources actually compromise nature?
    « Reply #1 on: 04/08/2008 14:42:24 »
    I think the amount of energy in wind, waves, sunlight etc. is massive compared to the amount we need. For example wind farms must be sapping energy from the wind but only a tiny proportion. Also, remember energy is never created or destroyed so one way or another that energy will still be around. 
    Logged
     

    Offline sarah cp

    • First timers
    • *
    • 8
    • Activity:
      0%
    Could green energy sources actually compromise nature?
    « Reply #2 on: 04/08/2008 15:02:57 »
    Wind and Wave energy are certainly very abundant, if only we could harvest them efficiently.

    Winds around the Earth are formed by the combination of the spin of the earth and the energy from the sun. Ocean currents are also involved. The different thermal properties of land and water mean that as they are heated up by the sun, the air above them will behave differently. This combined with the Coreolis effect of the world turning in space creates winds. Hopefully, unless the earth stops spinning or the sun goes out, wind energy will never run out! (although if those things did happen, i reckon running out of sustainable energy would be the least of our worries!). Similarly with wave power - waves are driven by ocean currents, the wind and by the tides (which are driven by the moon), so hopefully will not run out.

    The bigger problem we face is being able to harvest and convert the energy efficiently and cost effectively.
    Logged
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.37 seconds with 32 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.