The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Dark energy - a simple misunderstanding
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Dark energy - a simple misunderstanding

  • 2 Replies
  • 4442 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline John Hunter (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
Dark energy - a simple misunderstanding
« on: 02/11/2008 23:08:55 »
In newbielink:http://www.rescalingsymmetry.com [nonactive] is a possible (very simple) answer to the dark energy problem.

John Hunter
Logged
 



Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3389
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Dark energy - a simple misunderstanding
« Reply #1 on: 03/11/2008 18:07:18 »
You should post a brief explanation of the ideas as well as a reference to the website.  Please do this as soon as possible or I will report you formally to the atministrators as spamming the site.
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 

Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3389
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Dark energy - a simple misunderstanding
« Reply #2 on: 03/11/2008 18:14:28 »
I have skimmed through the website and suggest that this topic is more suited to new theories. 

John Hunter assuming that you are the author of this website and therefore understand the presentation how do your ideas fit in with the fine structure constant that has been proved constant out to vast distances.

« Last Edit: 03/11/2008 18:25:30 by Soul Surfer »
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.337 seconds with 33 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.