[AlanM (OP)]

2019 1 20

Oops – there I went again.  Never put your book down without at least finishing the current chapter.  By the time I got to page 114 all order had been restored, and my faith in Stephen’s posthumous publishers was back on track.

All I can add at this stage, is to say that I am doing all I can to tell people in public talks the good news.  There is no more mystery, all the dark stuff said to have been missing for so long has been properly accounted for by Stephen’s lucid prose about negative and positive energy and creation.  Let Mitchell’s Magical Myth Busting continue at full steam.

© Alan M and Zahra. (Well, it’s plagiarism, really. Or is it?)

2019 1 19

Just a suggestion:  Do what Stephen Hawking couldn't.  Play with a few spherical magnets, including non-magnetised ball bearings of different sizes, like I and my granddaughter Zahra have.  The first thing that might strike you (painfully) on one of your digits is a pair of magnets.  This is called the Engineering Approach.  It led me to my first conjecture, via the thought that magnetism isn't granular, but divisible into ever-decreasing quanta until we get to the ultimate form that Maxwell calculated all those years ago.  Massless magnetism is what we can discern as quarks.  We have given quarks six flavours - up/down, charmed/strange/ and top/bottom.  One pair of those just means north/south magnetism. Another just means back/wards/forwards relative to time. And the third pair is just clockwise spin/anticlockwise spin.
So
You might connect all that to the thought that nothing curves space more strongly than magnetism.  But wait.  Consider the mighty electron. Look at an atom of hydrogen. The proton consists of three quarks, two ups and a down (or maybe that should be two downs and an up. It doesn't really matter. One's an antiquark, closely entangled with its quark.  there is no more mysterious thing than the ability for the positive charge of the proton to be cancelled by a single electron buzzing around that proton like a bee in a cathedral. The electron can't really fly about fast enough to quite do the job. Its willing assistent, the almost massless something-ino, has to help out.  Whether the -ino is a gravitino, a neutrino, or a magnetrino is the question that needs to be decided.
I tend to think that that the -ino has to add a bit more negativity, rather than gravity or positronity to cancel the positivity of the three matter/antimatter quarks.  Adding quarkinos is not an answer either, though I'm often wrong about arithmetic, never mind mathematics.
Well, I hope this is helpful.
By the way, the Final Book published on behalf of Stephen rather startled me when I got to Nelson (page 111 in cricketing jargon).  The statement that black holes can't emit anything has to be a mistake.  Hawking radiation does exist. Quasars and neutron stars are detected by polar gamma rays doing gymnastics in space. Two colliding black holes have been detected because their polar radiation causes ripples in the fabric of space.  From our universe to our entangled anti-universe we have anti-radiation and anti-matter streaming through the black hole portal, so looked from inside the black hole (well, it has to be a sphere to be symmetrical with us, doesn't it?) the anti-matter life forms would never say our 'white' hole (no 'racism' intended, it's really just a word that implies 'anti-black' hole).
If you would like to see how all my conjecturing began, try the Naked Science Forum topics 713717 (symmetry there, eh ?) and the new theory the Naked Scientists made it, Topic 71376 (and Many Thanks to them) .
  Best Wishes, AlanM (and from Zahra too, of course.)

Report to moderator    105.227.146.87
Alan M

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=71317.0
 
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=71367.0

[AlanM (OP)]

(Not) the Last Word on this topic, surely?

With Ruby and Zahra moving on to bigger things, I think this probably is time to leave this theory of everything to its own devices.  It has turned out far, far simpler than I originally thought it might.

All that is needed to make the original conjecture simpler to answer, is to change it very slightly, and make it Alan M’s Assertion:  (ie, as Monty Python would have had it: “Cross out ‘contecture’ in pencil, and write ‘assertion’.)

So, the way to phrase the conjecture better, might be:

Dark energy and matter aren’t missing – they are just not there for all to see.  This is easily explained by conservation of momentum, and basic optics and electrotechnics.  So it has all been done by all whose thoughts and writings appear in the really simple textbooks, from Archimedes through, inter alia, Gallileo, Newton, Einstein , Feynman, and Hawking, to the present, on matters arithmetical, scientific.  It has been great making this all clear to the next generation, thanks to inspiration from Ruby and Zahra.  I commend their passions for science and the truth.

Stay humble, remember – anything humankind can show, Nature can show better, after all.

Mensdom is miskien net a bietjie te dom, nou en dan.

©Alan M, Ruby, and Zahra
Seaforth, West Sussex, and Hoedspruit
2019-4-27

[Origin]

Worst blog ever.

[AlanM (OP)]

Cosmos Case Closed? Light?s Limits Lifted? Time?s Trials Trivialised?
Teatime?s Treats Tripled?
Alan Stuart Mitchell
9/1/2024
Ask the right questions and the right answers suggest themselves. Which is how Alpha Beta Gamma Group was formed and operated. Our modus operandi is perfection personified. We keep it all as simple as possible, but no simpler. This work is an example. It uses just nine chapters, describes nine achievements, and reaches nine conclusions, in tying up the Cosmos Case, while solving the Unification of Gravity with Quantum Physics, the Holy Grail of Physical Science and Astronomy. Enjoy the read. It?s the briefest History of the Cosmos you?ll ever find. You first saw it here, courtesy of us, the Mitchell Family group spanning three generations, from Grandpa Alan (9 x 9 years old), via Graeme (53 years old), to Jesse Alan (2 x 9 years old). All not the dimmest of light sources.
1
1.THE TIME TRAVELLER?S TALE
Chaucer it was who shaped this narrative of how everything erupted into time and space. Darwin sped it on its way as space and time evolved via stars, universes, galaxies, planetary systems, and space debris into the spectacular pinnacle of the Cosmos.
Next, Panspermia intervened to start human evolution, thus providing the Grand Observer Designate, (whose Three Letter Acronym we leave to you the reader to find) to be the essential reporter on how the Cosmos attained its immortality.
With their observer in place, space and time were then able to begin pushing back darkness to admit light. As matter began condensing from the blast of plasma that rapidly expanded from the initially frozen pin ***** singularity Hawking describes so graphically, the Dragon of light emerged to oppose the Prince of Darkness, and share space and time, forever locked in their zero energy embrace.
Next, gravity took charge, ordering the matter to clump into suns, rocks, comets, meteors, moons, and planets, and to spin, thus beginning cycles of life and time.
In due course, all forms of life would evolve, and keep doing so, while life?s most cancerous of growths, humanity, went forth, multiplied, and covered the face of the Earth, at the behest of the Grand Old Dominatrix, obsessed as she has been with beginning all newe problems of life.
So here endeth the traveller?s tale, in an equal and balanced mix of Despair and Happiness, destined to add up to exactly zero, to obey the Cosmos?s Commands.
2. THE TIME KEEPER?S TALE
Of course, without Time Everything is Nothing. How can anyone go forward in life without time? A timeless Cosmos is rudderless, useless, and doomed to an unrecognised immortality. Time is actually an all-enveloping nutshell that defines the Immortality of the Cosmos.
So begins the Time Traveller?s Tale, as described in exquisite detail by Stephen Hawking. Father Time, as he is still described by the few remaining humans who retain the basics of literacy, prescribes the lifetimes of everything in the Cosmos that lives. Without life, time has no other function with which to occupy itself. A timeless Cosmos is rather futile, as nobody would be around to describe it, with not an audience in sight.
2
Time is its own opposite. It has no competitors. It?s a law unto itself. This has always puzzled Philosophers. Like lawyers and accountants, philosophers have no useful functions in life, except perhaps, expensively parting with useless advice to willing victims.
But Light puts its useful gifts to good use. It ignores attempts by humans like Einstein to limit its speed. E = mc2 was Einstein?s biggest mistake, of which there were more than a few. He also said space could not expand without matter. How daft is that? The whole Cosmos is empty, but keeps growing exponentially.
We return to our theme on Time. If it needs to be in more than one place at the same time, it just does it, like Nike. If you think about it that can be interpreted as saying its speed limit has been elevated to infinity. At the ?boundary? of the Cosmos, it?s the same time all around an infinite loop. That means Einstein was wrong to be concerned about so-called ?Spooky Action at a Distance?. Not only quantum particles, but also the entire Cosmos can be encircled by Father Time.
Now, unlike the Cosmos, universes have their individual times because they contain mass, so in universes life forms would find all Einstein?s equations acceptable. There?s no more we need to say about Time, so here endeth the Time Traveller?s Tale.
3. THE LIGHTHOUSE KEEPER?S TALE
Lighthouse keepers expired as Time became more expensive, telemetry developed, and remote control and electricity solved all their problems.
Still, without light, there can be no darkness, for how else could there be the required balance in the Cosmos? Light and dark are required to stay balanced, as is the case for any forms of energy in the cosmos. The Cosmos being the supplier of (first and) last resort, uses only one source of energy, the ceaseless jittering of tiny particles of energy, called photons, always frozen, so always shivering around their anchor points so freely available in space and time. They never run out, so we call them potential energy, always in stock.
Light is quite ubiquitous. There are no curtains in the Cosmos, only obstacles whose function is to produce shadows. The shadows darkness matches exactly the supply of light. (Have you not heard this before, somewhere?)
Now that the larder?s full, here endeth the Lighthouse Keeper?s Tale.
4
4. THE PHOTON?S TALE
Photons are delightful. They are massless, pull twice their (non-existent) weight, and travel at the universally accepted maximum pace of light. (Note that in the Cosmos we just lifted that limit to infinity. See item 3 above.)
We must expand a bit about that weight issue. Weight is an incomplete description. To weigh anything, it has to be accelerated by whatever it is in or on. In your bathroom it?s Planet Earth that accelerates you exactly as much as you accelerate it, which was Isaac Newton?s first awakening to Gravity.
In a Spaceship, which is all around you, ( rather like a Faraday Cage which screens you against lightning strikes), you are protected against gravitational waves, feeble though they be. It?s like being in a metal car or airplane in a thunderstorm. You?re perfectly safe.
To sum up, Weight is incomplete because you have to multiply your mass in kilograms by your acceleration in g, the force of gravity on earth. Just use 10 metres/s/s (it?s actually 9,8 metres/s/s, but your scale isn?t as accurate as that.)
The photon?s biggest and most important property is its self-sufficiency. It consists not only of matter, but also of anti-matter. It?s the Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde of particles. So self-sufficient is it that it manages to conceal its existence from human eyes by staying outside them. That?s why our eyes are the tiniest black holes, with irises as their event horizons. The pupils are not for emitting light, but only for admitting it. To gain admittance, only light reflected from anything hits the target, to let you see.
Because they travel together at the speed of light and are massless, so the matter antimatter partners have no net energy.. They are self-propelled by Maxwell?s interacting electric and magnetic fields. Though they have no net mass, they do have momentum. This gives them the thrust they need to accelerate. Only the impedance of free space impedes their progress, keeping their speed constant in the vacuum.
Their share of the dark energy that is said to be missing consists only of shadows cast by surrounding obstacles. These absorb momentum energy and become slightly warmer than their surroundings. The warmth then leaks into the ambient vacuum, and onward into the Cosmos.
Here endeth the Photon?s Tale.
5
5. THE TELEPORTER?S TALE
Teleportation was another of Hawking?s distractions. He was severely handicapped by his motor neuron disease, so had to make do without his hands. All he had left of his faculties comprised vital functions essential for life. His work is well recorded, but not his fun and games. Much of what he wrote in later life was meant to remedy that lack.
No longer writing Science papers and articles after his retirement, he worked hard at informing his lay public audiences. His beautifully illustrated later books are loaded with fantastic computer-generated images of ?black holes?, teleportation of people, and many other imaginative pictures.
Entertaining as they are, crusty old humans of every hue and colour find his imaginings a bridge too far to cross. So the teleporter?s tale ends here with Churchill?s snide remark that ?this is the sort of nonsense up with which we should not put!?
6. THE PROFESSOR?S TALE
University Professors are an under-graduate student?s worst nightmare. Being totally besotted with their latest fantasies, they become absolutely isolated in their white tower offices. Even their PA has little to do for her boss, other than typing up the odd (very) manuscript or perhaps a tape or two from her Dictaphone (whatever happened to good old Pitman?s shorthand?)
What professors are very good at is easing their distraught charger?s batteries. I never met a sourpuss professor. They always entered their lecture rooms with a smiley face, full of bonhomie and grace. At UCT Department of Electrical Engineering, we had only one professor in charge, Roland Guelke, an acoustician of note.
Richard Feynman?s early life was much influenced by his professors. They ranged from unhinged, through unintelligible to the highest levels imaginable. At the age of 28, he became acquainted with Albert Einstein, who listened to and approved of his first lecture to Princeton University in New Jersey, USA in 1946.
Feynman was respected by Niels Bohr, among about a dozen other experts he met at the Los Alamos project team. Niels Bohr told his son Aage that he admired the young Feynman for being so engrossed in his physics talks to superiors that he
7
would freely stop if senior staff disagreed with him, then put them right, firmly and politely
From our point of view, Professors worth their salt should all be Leaders of the Pack, top dogs, and cheerful chaps, with Field Marshall?s batons in their packs.
Frankly, this all has absolutely nothing to do with the Cosmos. So here endeth the Professor?s Tale.
6. THE GALACTIC TRAVELLER?S TALE
Galactic Travellers have always been wealthy boffins like Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Mark Shuttleworth, and Sir Richard Branson. From our point of view, they had absolutely nothing to do with the Cosmos Case, so shoo, the lot of you.
Here endeth the Spastic Galactics? Tale.
7. THE COSMIC EGG?S TALE
Cosmic Egg?s hatching out of empty space from time to time are most appropriate and nicely relate to our topic. Again, Feynman?s remark ?positrons moving backwards in time are like electrons moving forward in time? is our key.
These facts inspired ALPHA BETA GAMMA GROUP to propose that every plasma cloud would need to grow a protective antimatter shell around itself as it emerged into the vacuum of space, as if it were a living, sentient being. From mono-cellular organisms (cells) to baby elephant zygotes, every successful blastomere has managed this step properly by being sure to have all surrounding anti-matter form a shell that moves back in time to avoid annihilation. After this the shell and egg are fully entangled to travel everywhere together, but close enough in space time to react against unwanted intruders in micro-seconds of real time.
A typical space-time gap would be about 10 light-seconds or so.
Here endeth the 8th lesson
8. THE HOLY GRAIL OF PHYSICS TALE
The Holy Grail of Physics is to find out how to unify Albert Einstein?s work on Gravity with that of his peers on Quantum Gravity. This was solved at a stroke in
8
2012, when Nobel Physics Prize winners in 2013 for this work, Peter Higgs and Francois Englert were recognised for their work in this field.
The secret of the Holy Grail lived on, until our Group realised that nobody involved in those days realised that this unusual boson held the key to the Holy Grail?s location (in Ethiopia?). The odd things about this boson are its main function, and that it is the only boson without its own anti-boson. All other bosons have anti-twin brothers (or sisters, if you?re fuzzy).
So the Holy Grail is no longer a mystery. It lies hidden only because no-one at CERN had their eyes open at the time. Had they been awake, they may at once have seen the connection between massive astronomical objects and their miniscule cousins, the Higgs bosons. The former massive objects distort space time near them. The Higgs bosons inject mass into sub-atomic particles in the Higgs fields.
Here Endeth the 9th and Final Lesson in this issue of Alpha Beta Gamma?s tales.
9. CONCLUSIONS
Missing anti-matter found in Cosmic Egg Shells.
Missing dark energy found in common daylight.
Light?s Limits Lifted?
Time?s Trials Terminated?
Galaxies Givens Googled?
Cosmic Case Closed?
Design Data Determined?
Grand Observer Deified?
Time Trials Tested?.
Our conclusions number Nine Items. Alpha Beta Gamma invite comments on the ease of locating the relevant arguments in the text of paragraphs 1 to 6. Please be concise and to the point with your replies. Thank you in anti-cipation. We anticipate no death threats, but only mild criticisms, and even milder typo spots.
11
10. BIBLIOGRAPHY
The Universe. Its Beginning and End. Lloyd Motz.
Relativity. The Special and the General Theory. Albert Einstein. 1952.
Quantum Theory Cannot Hurt You. Markus Chown.
The Universe in a Nutshell. Stephen Hawking. 2001.
The Greatest Show on Earth. Richard Dawkins.
The Selfish Gene. Ibid.
The Blind Watchmaker. Ibid.
What is Time. GJ Whitrow.
The Illustrated Longitude. Dava Sobel and William J H Andrewes.

[AlanM (OP)]

Cosmos as a Featherbed

How Universes Mature and Die in Bed.


Anonymous Author


Date Unknown


Alpha Beta Gamma Group has solved the Unification of Gravity with Quantum Physics.  Anonymous Team Members are Grandpa Alan (9 x 9 years old), Graeme (53 years old), and Jesse Alan (2 x 9 years old).  Support your favourite charities.  Please send us no cash.


 
1
FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS
Before beginning these tales, we need to clarify two basic concepts of Space and Time, which all dictionaries call synonyms.  When we refer to Cosmos? (as in Cosmic), and ?Universe? (as in ?Universal?), we use these terms differently.
Cosmos we reserve exclusively for the sea of radiant light which forms the matrix in which universes can proliferate.  Universes we only use to mean the regions of Space and Time that accumulate the matter and antimatter needed to create light, time, and all other forms of energy.  The Cosmos exists solely to act as an infinite potential energy field, effectively the empty stage for all other actors in the cast of the play of life.  The Cosmos and the other players share their environment, namely all of Space and Time.  Space and Time alone (ie three physical, plus a single time dimension) are necessary and sufficient conditions to support everything needed for the Cosmos (and all its universes) to exist.  The zoos (universes) the Cosmos spawns, must live and die, but the Cosmos will not.

1.   THE TIME TRAVELLER?S TALE
Chaucer it was who shaped this narrative of how everything erupted into time and space.  Darwin sped it on its way as space and time evolved via stars, universes, galaxies, planetary systems, and space debris into the spectacular pinnacle of the Cosmos.
Next, Panspermia intervened to start human evolution, providing an observer without at least one of whom the cosmos lives unnoticed.
Their observer in place, space and time could start repelling darkness to admit light.  As matter began condensing from the blast of plasma fast expanding from its singularity in space and time, Time began its work, labelling all that emerged.
Next, gravity took charge, ordering matter to clump into suns, rocks, comets, meteors, moons, and planets, and to spin, so starting its cycles of life and time.
In time, all of life would keep evolving, and fruitlessly trying to improve what they saw about them.


2
2.  THE TIME KEEPER?S TALE
Of course, without time everything is nothing.  Can anyone progress in life without time?  Timeless, the cosmos is rudderless, useless, and unrecognisable.  Time is the all-enveloping matrix defining the extent of space-time.
All life in the cosmos depends on time to live as it was meant to do.  Life and time are symbiotic.  Timeless, the cosmos is futile.
Time is its own opposite.  It has no competition.  Light puts its gifts to good use.  Einstein was no watchmaker.  Had he ever seen an electronic clock display, he may have taken a different path in life.  Instead, he used the wrong tool for time.
If one uses a bedside clock, it soon reveals the four-fold identity that Einstein needed.  On its left side is a single digit binary clock, designed to display the number one for only three hours in twelve.  To its right are three fully functional clocks.  Apparently identical, each has a unique role, the first indicating hours twelve out of twelve, the second indicating ten minute intervals six times an hour, and the third indicating minutes all the time.  Einstein would have cried out in joy had he had such a powerful tool.  It might immediately have shown up his biggest errors about time and its measurement.  Correct interpretations of Time are vital components of his Theories of Relativity.

Assuming the extent of applicability of E = mc2 was Einstein?s second-biggest mistake.  His first was introducing his concept of a finite space-time matrix, to prevent his universe from expanding.  He was to recant later in life, after the work of Edwin Hubble showed that the extent of the universe was accelerating. 
Einstein also said space could not expand without matter, but did say the topic needed further discussion.  It is now accepted that all is expanding into eternity.
Being everyone?s perfect attendant, time seems omnipresent, and even omnipotent, like a cosmic observer would have to be.  The implication is that time knows no limits.
?Spooky Action at a Distance? is the best example we have of time disregarding the obvious.  There is no difference between being invisibly wrapped in a gravitational well like a so-called black hole, and being invisible like a Higgs boson lost in its massively curved miniature space-time matrix that needed a hugely expensive and powerful international project like CERN in Geneva to crack open.
3
Now, unlike the Cosmos, universes have their individual times because they contain mass, without which no life is possible.
Here endeth the Time Traveller?s Tale.
3. THE LIGHTHOUSE KEEPER?S TALE
As Time became more expensive, telemetry developed, and remote control and electricity solved all their problems, lighthouse keepers were paid off.
Still, without light, there can be no darkness, for how else could there be the required balance in the cosmos?  Light and dark have to stay balanced, as is the case for all energy forms in the cosmos.  The Cosmos, being the only infinitely distributed potential energy mine, we can also view as a cosmic refrigerator. Always at just 2,7 degrees Kelvin, it is an ideal environment for vacuum packing the infinitely many photons that form the majority of the potential light energy in the Cosmos.  More about Photons in the next Section.
So, here endeth this Section too.
4.THE PHOTON?S TALE
Light is quite ubiquitous.  There are no curtains in the cosmos, only its descendants produce shadows, to ensure that enough darkness is produced to balance the blinding white light the photons create as they shiver away in their frozen state of uncertainty (Heisenberg?s insight). 
Photons are delightful.  They are massless, pull twice their (non-existent) weight, and travel at the usual speed of light in universes.  (In the Cosmos zone of Space-Time, light has no upper speed limit, as we show in the Timekeeper?s Tale.)
The weight of an item depends on the local acceleration of gravity.  In space, and remote from mass concentrations, scales don?t work.  So your mass is practically impossible to determine.  All you can do is assume that your shape is staying much the same as it was when you got into your spaceship on earth.  You could be dangerously wrong, because bone density and muscle tissue can drop rather quickly unless you do your daily workouts in the gym.
Because they travel together at the speed of light and are massless, the matter- antimatter partners have zero net energy.  They are self-propelled by Maxwell?s

4
Inter-acting electric and magnetic fields.  Though they have no net mass, they do have momentum.  This gives them the thrust they need to accelerate.  Only the impedance of free space impedes their progress, and keeps their speed constant in the vacuum.  When measured in vacuum, the impedance is 377ohms exactly.
Their share of the dark energy said to be missing consists only of shadows cast by surrounding obstacles.  These absorb momentum energy and become slightly warmer than their surroundings.  The warmth then leaks into the ambient vacuum, and onward into the Cosmos.  It is not lost, but only seems to have been.  Another enduring mystery is hereby solved.
Here Endeth the Photon?s Tale.
5. THE TELEPORTER?S TALE
Teleportation was another of Hawking?s distractions.  He was severely handicapped by his motor neuron disease, so had to make do without his hands.  All he had left of his faculties comprised vital functions essential for life.  His work is well recorded, but not his fun and games, an omission he attended to in later life.
6. THE MERMAID?S TALE
Mermaids were imaginary, like one of Hawking?s examples of time.  This was yet another of his fantasies, and needs Occam?s razor urgently.  Remember that all time ends at the boundary (yes, there isn?t one!) of the cosmos.  Now you can immediately see what Hawking ought to have seen:  The cosmos can best be described as a boundless spheroidal shape.  It would be a perfect orb if it spun. 
(How would an observer decide the Cosmos was spinning?  In the Cosmos there cannot be any angular momentum, because there is no space for an anti-cosmos.  In any case, the Cosmos itself looks after all its own antimatter.  To complete this train of thought, reflect that the Cosmos needs no Space-Time for an anti-cosmos twin, because it is its own anti-cosmos, being purely photon-based!)
With Time being three dimensional at will, nothing imaginary is called for.  If you want to play in two dimensional time, flat paper charts and graphs (all two dimensional) they can be fun (like crosswords and Sudoku puzzles).  If you?re only able to stay in one dimensional space, there is simply no room to move, except forward, reverse and stop.  Unless you?re infinitely thin, you can?t fit in at all.
Here endeth this lesson.
5
5. THE ROC?S TALE
An extinct bird sets the scene for the demises of universes.  The cosmos being immortal, how do its progeny fare?  The short answer is ?As well as they deserve to.?  Here?s where the Scriptures make their mark.  The balance between Good and Evil is what this is all about. It may be a vain pursuit to assert, as organisations such as Green Peace, the World Wildlife Fund, and the Climate Change Agonists, do, when they suggest that mere mortals can do enough harm to Gaia to cause her downfall.  We contend that the only life form that will intentionally self-destruct is going to be so-called ?Humanity?.
6. TALES OF THE HOT AND COLD
Gino Segre?s book (see Bibliography) gives us our name for this new Section.
We allege that Stephen Hawking?s writings on black holes are rather antediluvian.
The black holes he writes about are alarmingly close to perpetual motion machines,
But they do have losses of energy.  They perspire, losing heat by perspiration, which Hawking found to be Hawking radiation.
They also lose a great deal of photon energy, which escapes from their poles, as most of them need to emit focussed beams of photons, called Maser energy.  No mass emerges, only photon energy does. 
So those are two functions of ?black holes?:  1). ?Pickitup? ie absorb solid waste, and 2).dump it in the Cosmos after purifying it into pure light, massless and taking up no space at all!
We propose a third function that nobody has thought of so far:  ?Black Holes? are like massive producers of distilled water for their universes.  Hawking would have been delighted to hear us suggesting this.  He might have been rather upset by our simultaneously crossing out another of his fantasies, his obsession with ?Naked singularities hidden in his ?black holes?.
As compensation, we have decided that naked singularities, no longer needed for the tasks he allocated to them, are just what we require the copious quantities of water that emerge from black holes to emerge from as the evaporated water launches itself into space-time from these huge distilleries.
As an aside, note that there is plenty of hydrogen throughout space-time, but the black hole distilleries do have to synthesise their own oxygen.  Synthesis of
6
oxygen on a large scale requires prodigious electrical power, but inside black holes that?s no problem because mass is being converted into photons in enormous amounts per second, and has to be consumed instantly because the background at 2,7 degrees Kelvin is not permitted to rise by even a few nanodegrees Kelvin as that violates the zero energy release dictum of the Cosmos.
Our previous concerns about the seemingly random nature of the lifetimes of universes can now be laid to rest.  Just as all forms of life in universes die in some normally random sets, so do universes die.  They suffer from random rates of ageing just as we do.  The range of ages at time of death starts at birth, and ends mainly in old age, with a bell shaped curve in between.
In universes, the main cause of death by ageing is shortening of the space-time dimension between the eggs and their contents.  It?s as if the Cosmic Zookeepers run out of vitamins to keep their captive eggs in proper health, and have to choose a convenient moment to inject a lethal dose or press the red button that briefly energises the electric chair.  In any event, death is instantaneous and again will light up whole galaxies in the Cosmos to ensure no variations in the zero energy edict of the Cosmos.
On the topic of universal deaths, only three likely space-time endings have been proposed so far: a) The quiet cold hypothermia death; b) The Big Crunch Death; c) The Big Bang Death.  We propose a fourth:  A Colossal Big Bang Death.  The biggest bang imaginable would arise if all a universe?s anti matter were simultaneously to bump into its matter.  Please note this can only happen in universes.  We are really serious when we say, universes in the cosmos are concentrations of mass, but the cosmos is made up of photons alone.
Here endeth this tale as well.
7. THE COSMIC EGG?S TALE
Cosmic Eggs hatching out of empty space from time to time are most appropriate and relate well to our topic.  Feynman?s remark ?positrons moving backwards in time are like electrons moving forward in time? is our key.
These facts inspired ALPHA BETA GAMMA GROUP to propose that every plasma cloud would need to grow a protective antimatter shell around itself as it emerged into the vacuum of space, as if it were a living, sentient being.

8
From mono-cellular organisms (cells) to baby elephant zygotes, every successful blastomere has managed this step properly by being sure to have all surrounding anti-matter form a shell that moves back in time to avoid annihilation.  After this the shell and egg are fully entangled to travel everywhere together, but close enough in space time to react against unwanted intruders in micro-seconds of real time.
A typical space-time gap would be about 10 light-seconds or so.  All universe?s Causa Mortis most likely end as described here. 
Here endeth the 7th lesson
8. THE HOLY GRAIL OF PHYSICS TALE
The Holy Grail of Physics is to find out how to unify Albert Einstein?s work on Gravity with that of his peers on Quantum Gravity.  This was solved at a stroke in 2012, when Nobel Physics Prize winners in 2013 for this work, Peter Higgs and Francois Englert were recognised for their work in this field.
The odd things about this boson are its main function, and that it is the only boson without its own anti-boson.  All other bosons have anti-twin brothers or sisters.
So the Holy Grail is no longer a mystery.  It lies hidden only because no-one at CERN had their eyes open at the time.  Had they been awake, they may at once have seen the connection between massive astronomical objects and their miniscule cousins, the Higgs bosons.  The former massive objects distort space time near them.  The Higgs bosons inject mass into sub-atomic particles in the Higgs fields.
Here endeth the 10th and Final Lesson.
9. CONCLUSIONS
Missing anti-matter found in Cosmic Egg Shells.
Missing dark energy found in common daylight.
Copious Cosmic Sources of water found in Space-Time.
Light?s Speed and Dimensional Limits Lifted.
Time?s Trivialities Truly Terminated?
In Time Nothing?s Imaginary, All of it is Real.
Universes Death Causes Identified.
Essential Independent Observer Justified.
Holy Grail of Physics Finally Explained.
9
Our conclusions total Nine Items.  Alpha Beta Gamma Group invites comments on the ease of locating the relevant arguments in the text.  Please be concise and to the point with your replies.  Thank you in anticipation.
Note:  Conclusions ending are for our readers to decide.  ?You be the Judge?.
 
10
10.  BIBLIOGRAPHY
The Universe.  Its Beginning and End.  Lloyd Motz.
Relativity.  The Special and the General Theory.  Albert Einstein. 1952.
Quantum Theory Cannot Hurt You.  Markus Chown.
The Universe in a Nutshell.  Stephen Hawking.  2001.
The Greatest Show on Earth.  Richard Dawkins. 
The Selfish Gene.  Ibid.
The Blind Watchmaker.  Ibid.
What is Time.  GJ Whitrow. 
The Illustrated Longitude.  Dava Sobel and William J H Andrewes.
15 Million Degrees ? A Journey to the Centre of the Sun.  Lucie Green.
Einstein?s Refrigerator.  Gino Segre.  2002.
The Spinning Magnet.  Alanna Mitchell. 2018.
Reflections of an Imagineer.  Mike Bruton.  2021.
The Floating Egg.  Roger Osborne.  1998.
Quantum.  A Guide for the Perplexed.  Jim Al-khalili.  2003.
Quantum Mechanics.  Ibid.  2017.

[Origin]

Cosmos as a Featherbed

How Universes Mature and Die in Bed.

Stupid concept, ignorant title.

Anonymous Author

The author is not just anonymous he is also an idiot.

[paul cotter]

Good with the word salad though, I have to admit.

[alancalverd]

Organic salad is fine, but it shouldn't actually smell of bullshit.

[AlanM (OP)]

9
9. BIBLIOGRAPHY
The Universe.  Its Beginning and End.  Lloyd Motz.
Relativity.  The Special and the General Theory.  Albert Einstein. 1952.
Quantum Theory Cannot Hurt You.  Markus Chown.
The Universe in a Nutshell.  Stephen Hawking.  2001.
The Greatest Show on Earth.  Richard Dawkins. 
The Selfish Gene.  Ibid.
The Blind Watchmaker.  Ibid.
What is Time.  GJ Whitrow. 
The Illustrated Longitude.  Dava Sobel and William J H Andrewes.
15 Million Degrees ? A Journey to the Centre of the Sun.  Lucie Green.
Einstein?s Refrigerator.  Gino Segre.  2002.
The Spinning Magnet.  Alanna Mitchell. 2018.
Reflections of an Imagineer.  Mike Bruton.  2021.
The Floating Egg.  Roger Osborne.  1998.
Quantum.  A Guide for the Perplexed.  Jim Al-Khalili.  2003.
Quantum Mechanics.  Ibid.  2017.
POSTSCRIPT: THE STING IS IN THE TALE.
A FEW MORE MINUTES ON TIME

Shape is critical for proper use of time.  If one just wants to time H Bolt at 10 m/s, using time in 3D lumps will do.  If one needs to use time to meet a space lab in orbit, and direction is vital, use 3D arrows of time.  If one needs to expand time to travel round earth in 80 days, while only ageing by 24 hours (Jules Verne, 1873), it?s important to use circular time.  Using time in loops also solves Einstein?s twin in space paradox.  By closing in on return to earth, the twin on the spaceship arrives back as dead as his
10

brother who died years before him.  Paradox solved.  It?s like boating on Zoo Lake in Jo?burg.  ?Come in Number 13, your time is up.?  You complete your last loop, thankful to be alive.  No crocodiles in Zoo Lake after all.  Or, imagine yourself marching three abreast in a military parade.  You don?t need to look sideways, you and the blokes on either side of you know in your bones that you?re perfectly in step, whether there?s a band playing or not.  This shape of time we call the 3D smoke ring, or deck quoit shape, because it?s a toroidal shape, not a light cone shape.  The moment you close any loop in your travels around space or just shopping in town, this smoke ring shape of time has had you in its grip.  It is instinctively felt with deep relief by most travellers in time.
So time can take whatever shape is needed for the job at hand.  Egg timers only work if there?s enough gravity around.  Space crews tell time using much more modern clocks than Einstein?s generation enjoyed.  Your master clocks at Greenwich use oscillating atoms to increase their accuracy to previously unheard of accuracies, so precise that they detect the differences in time of identical clocks in skyscraper basements and in the penthouse suite.  (Gravity is ever so slightly less from bottom upwards.)

We hope this little time loop has been enlightening for everyone still reading at this stage.

MAGNETISM: THE BEST KEPT FOR LAST
Magnetism, magnetic fields, and magnets need physical inputs from all, to find what no book will tell you.  Quarks and astronomic phenomena can be demonstrated with appropriate ball magnets, copper tubes, ferrite rods, ferritic magnets, and fridge magnets.  Mine are still with me.  Only let kids use them in your presence.  I give talks on them.  I am designing a cold sun model which I may be able to miniaturise and use to show how different life might have been if magnets with just one pole had been at time?s beginning.

That?s All Folks !  Alpha Bet Gamma Group.

[Bored chemist]

Re: Isn't dark energy & mass explained by power line theory & energy conservation?

No.

[paul cotter]

With that definitive and all encompassing answer provided by BC, I believe we can now close this discussion.

[paul cotter]

That?s All Folks ! Is that a promise? Please make it so, please!

[AlanM (OP)]

For those like the last fellow with his brilliant No, notice that he is still living way back when the very first question was posed by AlanM.  Why are you so out of date, RIP (?) van Winkel.  Get your anonymous act together, and try to prove my latest 10 conclusions wrong.  Put that in your clay pipe and smoke it.  I hope it makes your day.  AlanM.  (Next time put your name where your foot normally rests.)

[paul cotter]

Not so. It is up to the proponent of a claim to prove it. The burden of proof is on you, not on us to disprove it.

[Halc]

Topic is devolving into personal attacks, apparently due to OP not being able to back any of the assertions by other means.  Locking this.  Do not open a new topic on it.

Your prior post constitutes a warning for site terms violation.