The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Dark matter
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Dark matter

  • 27 Replies
  • 16202 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Dark matter
« Reply #20 on: 29/01/2009 15:19:07 »
Quote from: Vern on 29/01/2009 15:16:28
Quote
Eh? I thought it was as a result of trying to establish why galaxies don't lose their stars.
You can say it that way, but it seems kind of odd; the stars had to get where they are by the force of gravity. We used to simply say that some galaxies spin too fast. But it is true that according to Newton, stars in those too-fast galaxies should fly off into space.


Exactly. So something is either pulling on them to hold them in place (gravity in the form of dark matter), or there is a pressure pushing them from outside the galaxy that is holding them there.
Logged
 



Offline Vern

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2072
  • Activity:
    0%
    • Photonics
Dark matter
« Reply #21 on: 29/01/2009 15:23:59 »
Quote from: DoctorBeaver
Exactly. So something is either pulling on them to hold them in place (gravity in the form of dark matter), or there is a pressure pushing them from outside the galaxy that is holding them there.
This reminds me of the push-gravity scheme that was popular some years ago. I think it was Feynman's firm rejection of that notion that was its demise.
Logged
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Dark matter
« Reply #22 on: 29/01/2009 15:31:22 »
What I'm thinking is a bit different from that
Logged
 

Offline Vern

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2072
  • Activity:
    0%
    • Photonics
Dark matter
« Reply #23 on: 29/01/2009 16:10:51 »
Quote from: DoctorBeaver on 29/01/2009 15:31:22
What I'm thinking is a bit different from that
Interesting; is it something you can describe?
Logged
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Dark matter
« Reply #24 on: 29/01/2009 17:09:22 »
Quote from: Vern on 29/01/2009 16:10:51
Quote from: DoctorBeaver on 29/01/2009 15:31:22
What I'm thinking is a bit different from that
Interesting; is it something you can describe?

I'll try to write it out first then post it here if I succeed
Logged
 



Offline Vern

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2072
  • Activity:
    0%
    • Photonics
Dark matter
« Reply #25 on: 29/01/2009 17:15:34 »
Quote from: DoctorBeaver
I'll try to write it out first then post it here if I succeed
Thanks; I'll be watching for it.
Logged
 

Offline demadone

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 112
  • Activity:
    0%
Dark matter
« Reply #26 on: 30/01/2009 08:14:01 »
The biggest reason why we suspect the existence of dark matter is the fact that galaxies form clusters and super clusters. the distances are too big for them to be held by ordinary gravity.

Maybe there is a kind of gravity that results from atoms that is weaker than gravity but can on very large distances. I believe this is the first time this is being said. I can explain why...
Logged
 

Offline Vern

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2072
  • Activity:
    0%
    • Photonics
Dark matter
« Reply #27 on: 30/01/2009 11:22:47 »
Quote from: demadone
The biggest reason why we suspect the existence of dark matter is the fact that galaxies form clusters and super clusters. the distances are too big for them to be held by ordinary gravity.
I don't think you have this exactly right. The first mention I see is in measurements of the speed of rotation of galaxies. Some galaxies are seen to be spinning so fast that stars on the outer parameter should be flying off into space.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.313 seconds with 47 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.