The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Technology
  4. Cheap Chinese compact fluorescent lamps
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Cheap Chinese compact fluorescent lamps

  • 3 Replies
  • 5908 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nighthawk (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
  • Activity:
    0%
Cheap Chinese compact fluorescent lamps
« on: 04/02/2009 13:20:53 »
They cost two or three times less then a good CFL, and it seems that there are only daylight (6500K) models. Their power ranges from 20 to 50 watts, but their light output is low. They are as bright as incandescent bulb of the same power.

I was just wondering - how can you make a fluorescent lamp so badly. If you had too little mercury in it, it would glow red (neon and other gasses), if the phosphorus layer was too thin it would be bluish or violet. Light output per watt of all fluorescent lights should be roughly the same, right? Then I opened few of them, and few good CFLs and I noticed that good ones have transistors rated for much higher power than Chinese ones. Chinese lamps are also a lot cooler then normal CFLs, the one I now have in my desk lamp is rated at 36W, but is is as warm as 36W 4ft fluorescent tube, only slightly warmer than room temperature. Even if they had terribly inefficient phosphorus that absorbs more UV than it converts it should be a lot warmer, right? Electronic ballast should be warm too if it really gives 36 watts, but it's not warm at all.

My conclusion is that these CFLs use only about 10-15W, and that the Chinese only stamp higher numbers to trick people into thinking that their lamps are good. What do you think about this?

The reason that I'm making all this fuss is that I could really use about dozen of cheap CFLs even if they are dim (desk lamps, closets...), but if they consume the amount of power that is stamped on them, then it has no point. I have no easy way of measuring the power, I have only two multimeters, but none of them can measure AC current (and then there's power factor...).

Btw, I'm from Serbia, and I think that these crappy CFLs are only exported into crappy countries like mine, I don't think you can buy them in any normal country.
Logged
 



Offline graham.d

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2207
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Cheap Chinese compact fluorescent lamps
« Reply #1 on: 04/02/2009 13:35:45 »
I bought some energy saving CFLs in IKEA and noticed that they were made in two countries (one was China) with very slightly different specifications, although sold as one type. However, I have to say they are very good. A short warm up period (about 15 seconds) to full brightness and these 11W units are equivalent to more than a 60w incandescent lamp. They appear, externally, well constructed too, with a secondary glass casing around the tube. I have not had them long enough to comment on their life.

Chinese components and electronic equipment can be as good as anywhere, but may not be. It is up to the importer to verify and demand a quality standard. From a design perspective, from my personal experience, many of the Chinese high tech companies have yet to establish good working practices and designs are often not well toleranced. Sometimes construction techniques are based on manual construction systems rather than more automated and more naturally fault free systems. But then they produce equipment and very low costs and so people will accept this. The best of the Chinese companies are as good as anyone, though. Usually you get what you pay for.
« Last Edit: 04/02/2009 13:43:49 by graham.d »
Logged
 

lyner

  • Guest
Cheap Chinese compact fluorescent lamps
« Reply #2 on: 05/02/2009 18:11:01 »
Why not measure the current they take? It wouldn't be hard to do with a multimeter and it would resolve the question.
Logged
 

Offline nighthawk (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
  • Activity:
    0%
Cheap Chinese compact fluorescent lamps
« Reply #3 on: 06/02/2009 13:49:27 »
I can't measure AC current. I have two DT838 digital multimeters that measure only DC. I had an idea to connect the light with a diode (or 4 diodes for full wave rectification) in series and then measure the current (and I will probably do that just for fun), but that would probably affect accuracy. Or maybe I could connect it with and incandescent light in series and then measure voltage on it's ends, or something like that??
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.225 seconds with 34 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.