The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Mainstream F=ma And The Equivalence Principle
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Mainstream F=ma And The Equivalence Principle

  • 3 Replies
  • 4339 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline common_sense_seeker (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 213
  • Activity:
    0%
    • Believers In Gravity Shielding (BiGS)
Mainstream F=ma And The Equivalence Principle
« on: 12/05/2009 13:17:23 »
It was my favourite equation from school. It made sense; you could push something heavy and it would take a lot of force and if you pushed something light it would accelerate quickly. It was common sense, f=ma; you knew it made sense. But how can this feeling of certainty be equivalent to the feeling of falling bodies? The thought of a light object falling at the same rate as a lead weight doesn't instantly appeal to the psyche. It's not something that feels intuitively right. It isn't the same feeling of certainty that the moving force brings. The force of my hand can be seen to apply to all the particles of a solid object. If gravity is actually due to particles, then it is not necessarily the same case with falling bodies. We can't see the interactions taking place.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_principle
Logged
 



lyner

  • Guest
Mainstream F=ma And The Equivalence Principle
« Reply #1 on: 13/05/2009 00:00:45 »
I should try to read around a bit more and use your intuition a bit less. Intuition is a very suspect reason for deriving Physical Laws.
It's pretty intuitive to think that everything slows down. Newton put us right on that one.
Logged
 

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7705
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
Mainstream F=ma And The Equivalence Principle
« Reply #2 on: 13/05/2009 07:09:25 »
You might not be feeling it but I certainly am. [:)]
Logged
 

lyner

  • Guest
Mainstream F=ma And The Equivalence Principle
« Reply #3 on: 13/05/2009 17:31:59 »
I'm still rarin' to go.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.313 seconds with 34 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.