The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Non Life Sciences
Geology, Palaeontology & Archaeology
Identifying rudimentary shapes from satellite
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Identifying rudimentary shapes from satellite
1 Replies
10998 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
nicephotog
(OP)
Sr. Member
482
Activity:
1%
Thanked: 11 times
[ censored ]
Identifying rudimentary shapes from satellite
«
on:
30/07/2009 08:08:03 »
I was taking a look in google earth at what archeology sites were like at points where the ground had not been disturbed and reached. At various points in various countries but admittedly at either 300ft or 100M on the scale legend in Google-Earth it does not allow closer evaluation and is only worth continuing to look over small areas if there are consistent shapes and terrain matches.
E.G. a Harrapan Indus city in India being unearthed shows at 100M it is effectively possible to see into the soil and short grass the pattern of walls and buildings.
But older communities such as settlements and lone building areas are interesting to suspect e.g. Somalia with the worlds biggest stone age "brick" as seen from space approx. 40M x 40M x 40M and other odditties of formation.
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8R2_L8M5b8
The shape of stones
with right anglular tendency
in the region
is often(common)
,
but
these are littered excessively and it should be seen
where the "place" isn't(remoteness)
.
I think i'd get bored there too , and also scratch my head and wonder why i did that also.
Heres a Thailand hill and some .kmz places (ZIP 2Mbyte) for google earth with respective photo JPEGs from google earth(Somalia and Thailand).
There is plenty more suspicious activity from bc in Somalia in various forms around 10 - 20 Km apart but that best left for discussion. These appear that something may have at least modified them if they could not move them in Somalia.
Of the Thai area , it appears it may have been modified into the rock also , not a complete attempt particularly to commit removal/move.
Do these classify as making any sense as something?
http://www.nicephotog-jsp.net/Thailand-remnant-300ft-100M-somal-quarry.zip
Somalia:
If that is right send me a complete insignifying full envelope:
«
Last Edit: 30/07/2009 13:50:11 by nicephotog
»
Logged
How To Tutorial (all Java servers) HttpOutPutTools (port to .jar Hell Pig Entelodont) 2nd November 2022
https://1drv.ms/u/c/9841b77e61824484/EUuxfLoCHP9MpN62Kt8hwLEBpcAc3mxG-r3gwtpEIaB_VA
nicephotog
(OP)
Sr. Member
482
Activity:
1%
Thanked: 11 times
[ censored ]
Identifying rudimentary shapes from satellite
«
Reply #1 on:
15/11/2009 11:06:01 »
I just changed my hosting company recently(so i could use and demonstrate J2EE 5 on Tomcat 6) and hadn't put the zip(2.3Mb) back along with the pictures.
There back there now.
The zip shows other geological shapes i cannot say are all that likely to be natural though against the size scale they have an immense magnitude(no wonder if they are not natural that someone gave up on it, theyr'e just a criminal size at it).
Logged
How To Tutorial (all Java servers) HttpOutPutTools (port to .jar Hell Pig Entelodont) 2nd November 2022
https://1drv.ms/u/c/9841b77e61824484/EUuxfLoCHP9MpN62Kt8hwLEBpcAc3mxG-r3gwtpEIaB_VA
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...