[LB7 (OP)]

I think I understood how the device works. There are 2 mechanisms in one. The basic device is a rotor composed with a positive and a negative electrostatic charge in rotation around itself. The electrostatic charge PUSH and PULL the rotor at distance (a mass = a rotor), the law is well in 1/d³ but the charge is the sum divided by 2 of all the electrostatic charges, so the PUSH and PULL is very high, enough to synchronized the masses at distance. The mean of the PUSH/PULL from the electrostatic charges is ZERO, it is not the source of gravity ! it is only the method to synchronized an object at distance. In addition, to the PUSH/PULL there is another method: the electromagnetism, and this is the gravitation. The electromagnetism need to push/pull but maybe the function is realized by the shape of the rotor itself, I need only a force that can attract all object around, in fact the mean not at 0, the law with magnetism is well at 1/d². And the electrostatic rotor is well build to have a mean different from 0. Maybe, it's possible to attract all objects around with all rotors synchronized. I think in 2d but in 3d it could be the same even the trajectories are more complex for the rotors.

The electrostatic PUSH/PULL don't need any energy, the law is a function 1/d³, with 'd' the distance. I think the force is VERY HIGH.

The electromagnetism needs an energy, the energy must be created inside the device. The law is a function 1/d², with 'd' the distance. The force maybe is directly the gravity (a small force) but maybe it is a high force PUSH/PULL and the mean is small. I think, this is the delay + synchronization that could give the attraction. Gravity acts at high distance (in comparaison to the size of the basic-rotor) so the basic-rotor is a magnetic dipole and the rotor works in 3 dimensions even it is fixed. In that case, the force of gravity comes from the electromagnetism force directly and it is a small force, it is easier to build an antigravity motor.

Maybe the rotor turn very fast, maybe not, but at distance the mean value of attraction from electromagnetism is 0 with a perfect theoretical sensor (don't forget a real sensor have mass-particle inside it). The instant value with a perfect theoretical sensor is not 0. It is like measure a sinusoidal electric voltage, with a DC voltmeter the value is 0, with an oscilloscope it is possible to see the real wave. So, it could be easier to build an antigravity motor if the angular velocity of the rotor is small and if the value of the electromagnetic field is small. Like some people must tested (in the past) the AG with alternative magnetic fields, the frequency tested is not enough for gravity. The problem: how to create a frequency at 1e20 Hz ? Maybe with a Dirac function, the slope could give the good frequency, even it is for a small time, several LC circuit in parallel could select in one LC the good frequency, just to test this theory. The good LC circuit can give the good waves for decrease or increase the gravity of an object.

                                                         |------LC1------|
(1)-------- ---Dirac Generator  ------|------LC2------|------------------(1)
                                                         |------LC3------|

The value of the frequency of the electromagnetic field could be calculated by physicists, because this theory must be coherent with the observation with the Universe.

The rotor must be simple:



2 electrostatics charges in each mass-particle.

With N objects, the synchronization is not perfect, but the only problem is the inertia, it is possible 2 objects interract each others with the frequency 1e20 Hz and another one object with theses 2 last at a frequency of 0.5e20 Hz, the main function ONE TURN only because it is an attraction for each turn, the mean don't change with 1 round, 2 rounds, or 3.

[LB7 (OP)]

Have you seen that:

https://www.rt.com/news/403177-china-emdrive-space-travel/

?

[Yahya]

Mass don't exist: it is an electromagnetism repulsive force follows by an electromagnetic attraction, the sum is not 0 and the frequency is high

but it suddenly appears ( in case of objects contact) why it does not appear at distances? if it exists , when you remove weight from an object  an object should jump as a result of this force.

[LB7 (OP)]

but it suddenly appears ( in case of objects contact) why it does not appear at distances?

The forces I explained work at distance too. Imagine you push and pull something, if the force of pushing is the same than the force of pulling, the mean is zero. But at small distance (small distance for Universe!) the pulling is greater than the pushing so the object is like attracting, that we call gravitation, and we explain there is a mass. But there is no mass, it is a electromagnetic rotor. All objects are electromagnetic rotors. At small distance the mean is an attraction, but at big distance (Universe) the objects can be in "phase" so it could be a mean attraction or a repulsion.

if it exists , when you remove weight an object should jump as a result of this force

Why ? I didn't understand

[Yahya]

you mean what intervene a mass when it touches another mass is not the existence of masses , but the force between them  right? then when I press a table there are two forces " the repulsive force "and my force I exert with my hand , the  resultant of the two is zero , but when I take away my hand the table should jump as a result of the existence of the "repulsive force"?

[LB7 (OP)]

you mean what intervene a mass when it touches another mass is not the existence of masses , but the force between them  right?

No, the mass doesn't exist, never. It is electromagnetism. Our body feels the mean. We called mass something like "electromagnetic rotor".

then when I press a table there are two forces " the repulsive force "and my force I exert with my hand , the  resultant of the two is zero , but when I take away my hand the table should jump as a result of the existence of the "repulsive force"?

The force you give to the table is a constant force, 5 second for example. The forces I explained have a very high frequency, maybe 1e40 Hz (less or more I don't know), so push a very short time compared to your hand, and pull a very short time too.

[Yahya]

if the force not constant  the "mass" will need some kind of continuous energy source to run.

[Bored chemist]

You are trying to produce gravitational attraction using electrical forces. this is correct.

No  it isn't.

[LB7 (OP)]

if the force not constant  the "mass" will need some kind of continuous energy source to run.

Yeah, all people says that, I don't understand why but it must be true (if you could explain I would be happy). The energy is not a problem, because, for me, the energy must be created and I explained in another thread my ideas to break the conservation of the energy in a closed device and I think I found.

The force of electromagnetism attraction respects the law 1/d² like gravity, because it is a magnetic force not an electrostatic force. At start, I thought it was an electrostatic push/pull but the law is 1/d³ so it must be the electromagnetism. And in this case, something must give the energy to apply that electromagnetism push/pull.

[LB7 (OP)]

My theory needs energy to create the radiation for the electromagnetic field. But this energy is needed one time, a short time, because all matters creates radiation, and exchange radiations, so the matter act like a capacitor but I think my theory about graviation, mass, dark matter, inertia, etc. don't need to create energy. But anyway, I found a solution for create the energy too and I think it is link with a demonstration in physics, I don't remember the name, but if mass is not respected so the energy is not respected too.

Edit:

Gravity could be a repulsive force followed by an attractive force, the mean not at zero. You can imagine the matter like an electrostatic+electromagnetic rotor, each matter is a rotor, more or less in phase with others matters at distance, it depends of the distance. There is the electrostatic rotor and the electromagnetic rotor. The matter does not rotate itself, but something inside each particle that could create an electrostatic and electromagnetic field, I don't know what exactly. The electrostatic field is used to synchronized the matter at distance with to be in phase with the others matters around it, and the electromagnetic field is there to give what we call gravity. The amplitude of the electrostatic field is very high, high like the sum of the all electrostatic charge inside the matter, but the period of the signal is very small, small like the "dipole" that creates that field. The sign of the phase angle of the electromagnetic field varies from -1 to +1, so gravity can be attractive or repulsive. Maybe a simple electrostatic dipole {+/-} could be in rotation in each particle creates that fields. With that, gravity can change its sign or its value with the phase angle, and we don't need the dark matter. So, the mass doesn't exist. Nor the kinetic energy, it could be the deformation of that dipole, like deform an electric capacitor changes the potential energy. So, look (with good eyes ) the shape of that dipole and you could have the absolute velocity of the matter, yeah the straight velocity could start at 0 to 'c'. The dipole could be deformed by the straight velocity: the dipole is turning and it moves in translation too, one part of the dipole moves in the same direction than the rotation, the other part moves in the contrary direction than the rotation, but the velocity is limited by 'c' so the shape is deformed more and more with the straight velocity. It could explain the relative time too, the time to rotate one turn is what we call the relative time, more you move in translation, more you need time to make a round, it is like a quartz of a microprocessor, I supposed all the characteristics of each atom is link to that rotation of the dipole, even sure, the chemistry. And with that, there is an absolute time, what it that absolute time? I don't know. It could explain inertia or repulsive galaxy too. It could explain the attraction of a photon. OK, someone said to me I need an energy if something inside the particle create an electromagnetic field, I'm not sure, if I suppose all the matter have at start (big-bang) its own electromagnetic field, after, it is just exchange the electromagnetic field from each others. Or maybe he's right and I need an energy so my device to create/destroy the energy is welcomed.