The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Non Life Sciences
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
Why do more distant stars have a greater red-shift?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Why do more distant stars have a greater red-shift?
0 Replies
3490 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Grant Holdom
Guest
Why do more distant stars have a greater red-shift?
«
on:
23/05/2011 11:01:02 »
Grant Holdom asked the Naked Scientists:
Hi Chris,
I have a question for the Ben and the Naked Astronomists crowd if you could pass this on please.
I understand that the further we look out the greater the tail lights (red shift) on the stars and that this is taken to mean the stars are moving away from us at an increasing rate.
However, does this consider the time element? If we are looking, back over a large chunk of time, doesn't this just mean that they were once accelerating away at an increased rate, and that this acceleration may have slowed over time? This would still be consistent with observations that the nearer (not so far back in time) the star, the less it is accelerating away from us.
Over to the knowledgeable ones!
Many thanks in advance.
Love (and am educated by) the shows
!
Grant (in New Zealand)
What do you think?
«
Last Edit: 23/05/2011 11:01:02 by _system
»
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...