The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Why do more distant stars have a greater red-shift?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why do more distant stars have a greater red-shift?

  • 0 Replies
  • 3490 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Grant Holdom

  • Guest
Why do more distant stars have a greater red-shift?
« on: 23/05/2011 11:01:02 »
Grant Holdom  asked the Naked Scientists:
   
Hi Chris,
 
I have a question for the Ben and the Naked Astronomists crowd if you could pass this on please.
 
I understand that the further we look out the greater the tail lights (red shift) on the stars and that this is taken to mean the stars are moving away from us at an increasing rate.
 
However, does this consider the time element?  If we are looking, back over a large chunk of time, doesn't this just mean that they were once accelerating away at an increased rate, and that this acceleration may have slowed over time?  This would still be consistent with observations that the nearer (not so far back in time) the star, the less it is accelerating away from us.
 
Over to the knowledgeable ones!
 
Many thanks in advance.
Love (and am educated by) the shows!
 
Grant (in New Zealand)

What do you think?
« Last Edit: 23/05/2011 11:01:02 by _system »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.261 seconds with 24 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.