The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Atomic Reconstruction
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Atomic Reconstruction

  • 3 Replies
  • 6120 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Balisk (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 8
  • Activity:
    0%
Atomic Reconstruction
« on: 19/02/2012 06:36:47 »
Hi I'm new here and I have this theory that I find sorta controversial if it ever were to be proven true and I have been wanting some opinions on it from people who know what they are talking about.

My theory Atomic Reconstruction is based off the fact that we can use highly intense electromagnetic fields to keep atoms or really matter away from a single atom of anti-matter for studying for less then a second well if we were to improve on the EMF's so that they could be stabilized at a much higher level that they could be then used on the individual atom and its components being mainly the protons that atom could then be reconstructed by having the EMF's take away a proton or feasibly add one to thus change the properties of the atom allowing for it to be changed.  Taking from this if say at its highest form a portable version were to be made one could become a god as this would also in-tale immortality in the form of not aging do to having the atomic structure of our cells be renewed to keep us the same age, in addition to being able to change anything into anything else and protection from anything lethal do to an atomic shield.  These are some of the applications aside from any given do to common sense.

So if anyone would be willing to comment I would appreciate it.
Logged
 



Offline imatfaal

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2782
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • rouge moderator
Re: Atomic Reconstruction
« Reply #1 on: 22/02/2012 11:35:01 »
Hi Balisk - you are gonna have to explain in more detail and with a bit more attention to simple sentences/language; I cannot follow what you are trying to express.
Logged
There’s no sense in being precise when you don’t even know what you’re talking about.  John Von Neumann

At the surface, we may appear as intellects, helpful people, friendly staff or protectors of the interwebs. Deep down inside, we're all trolls. CaptainPanic @ sf.n
 

Offline Balisk (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 8
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Atomic Reconstruction
« Reply #2 on: 22/02/2012 18:27:23 »
Quote from: imatfaal on 22/02/2012 11:35:01
Hi Balisk - you are gonna have to explain in more detail and with a bit more attention to simple sentences/language; I cannot follow what you are trying to express.

ok simply put my theory involves changing the properties of an atom by using super powerful electromagnetic fields to take away or add protons to an atom.  Sorry im not all that good at communicating whats in my head effectively.

I came up with this after reading about how scientists use electromagnetic fields to separate a single particle of anti-matter from regular matter for studying so I thought well if we can make EM fields that strong could we build on that and make them even stronger and more accurate so we could pinpoint them to move protons.
« Last Edit: 22/02/2012 18:31:50 by Balisk »
Logged
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 81685
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 178 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
Re: Atomic Reconstruction
« Reply #3 on: 26/02/2012 23:39:59 »
As some sort of radiative 'pincers' rearranging molecules and atoms inside the body? I've been wondering about something similar, if we could use radiation originating from two, or more, sources and where they 'crisscross' then operate, or stimulate, for example inside the brain. It would make for good non intrusive surgery. But the implications for it being used 'evilly' roams just as large in my mind.

Seems there are no things without a 'backside' to it.
Logged
URGENT:  Naked Scientists website is under threat.    https://www.thenakedscientists.com/sos-cambridge-university-killing-dr-chris

"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.252 seconds with 35 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.