The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Non Life Sciences
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
QED by Richard Feynman
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
QED by Richard Feynman
3 Replies
4770 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
PAOLO137
(OP)
Jr. Member
32
Activity:
0%
QED by Richard Feynman
«
on:
03/02/2012 13:32:33 »
I have just finished reading this very well known book by Richard Feynman. I understand he tried to make the subject
suitable to be understood by non-experts, but some aspects are such to generate more questions instead of answering
some.
I will try to make an example. In the book it is written that QED has been capable to give the most precise theoretical
results of all physics if compared with experiment, something like one over ten millions or so. But nothing is said about of what experimental situation or situations we are speaking of. This left me with a sense of unsatisfaction. Can somebody
add some practical detail to Feynman's descriptions?
«
Last Edit: 03/02/2012 21:57:28 by chris
»
Logged
Paolo de Magistris
lightarrow
Naked Science Forum King!
4605
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 16 times
Re: QED
«
Reply #1 on:
03/02/2012 20:24:08 »
If I remember correctly, he referred to electron's gyromagnetic ratio:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyromagnetic_ratio
Logged
origami
First timers
3
Activity:
0%
Re: QED by Richard Feynman
«
Reply #2 on:
27/02/2012 03:12:12 »
Fields were invented to explain action at a distance. The only difference is that they are graduated therefore their strengths can be measured. For millennia people have played with magnetic iron filing patterns which suggest that something emanates from one pole and travels around to the other. When it was discovered that a current spinning around a solenoid also generated the same effect on iron filings as magnets did early scientists adopted the same polar principles. They were so committed to the old science that they simply ignored the blindingly obvious fact that the magnetism spins parallel to the current. Thus magnets have clockwise and anticlockwise magnetic poles. They generate magnetic vortexes which obey Bernoulli principles. Co-parallel flows attract, anti-parallel flows repel. Magnets are a construct of thousands of same spinning magnetic vortex columns held together by atomic forces. The magnetism is moving anti-parallel at the interface between neighbouring columns therefore the columns are mutually repulsive. When the vortexes emerge from the poles they are free of atomic restraints so they spray out. Some of them unite with the sprays from the other end. They are self repulsive so spaces occur between filing lines.
Logged
Sprool
Sr. Member
120
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 1 times
Re: QED by Richard Feynman
«
Reply #3 on:
27/02/2012 12:20:18 »
i think origami's post belongs in the Deja Vu thread?
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...