The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. How should operators be expressed to group them?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

How should operators be expressed to group them?

  • 2 Replies
  • 3141 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lostinspace (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 6
  • Activity:
    0%
How should operators be expressed to group them?
« on: 13/05/2013 11:51:39 »
I'm struggling with some aspects of group theory required for quantum mechanics - in particular when operators are bracketed then (AB)C= A(BC) is required for associativity. This is explained as the end result must be the same for both sides , but the operators are done from right to left so for both sides of the equation the order will be C then B then A. This obviously gives the same result for both sides! but I thought the brackets imply these operators are carried out first - if you ignore them and carry out the operators right to left it is bound to be equal. If the operators are for example rotations and reflections, then how can you group them with brackets then ignore the brackets when you perform the operations?
« Last Edit: 13/05/2013 16:33:54 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline damocles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 756
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: How should operators be expressed to group them?
« Reply #1 on: 14/05/2013 06:10:03 »
You have it all back to front. It is because of the associative law that we can afford to do this.
In reality we should do the operation inside the parentheses first, then the other one (in the correct order), before applying the operation to the object, but it does not really matter.
Logged
1 4 6 4 1
4 4 9 4 4     
a perfect perfect square square
6 9 6 9 6
4 4 9 4 4
1 4 6 4 1
 

Offline damocles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 756
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: How should operators be expressed to group them?
« Reply #2 on: 14/05/2013 08:57:46 »
I do not have full command of bbl codes, so I will use s instead of sigma

I am taking an example from C3v[/i] symmetry group.

C31 * s(1) = s(2); s(2)*s(2) = E
s(1)*s(2) = C32; C31 * C32 = E


Thus we have {C31 * s(1)} * s(2) = C31 * {s(1) * s(2)}
« Last Edit: 14/05/2013 09:06:12 by damocles »
Logged
1 4 6 4 1
4 4 9 4 4     
a perfect perfect square square
6 9 6 9 6
4 4 9 4 4
1 4 6 4 1
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.498 seconds with 36 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.