The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Electromagnetic singularity
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Electromagnetic singularity

  • 3 Replies
  • 6531 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6996
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 192 times
  • The graviton sucks
Electromagnetic singularity
« on: 24/09/2013 18:59:18 »
We have a theory of the gravitational singularity. This involves time dilation and length contraction among other properties. At this point physics breaks down. The other area of physics that breaks down is the approach of light speed by particles other than photons. This also involves time dilation and length contraction. As the photon is an expression of electromagnetic radiation and has a zero rest mass could it in some sense be thought of as an electromagnetic singularity. As any mass that could possibly reach light speed would be compressed in the direction of travel in much the same way as it is approaching a gravitational singularity. The difference being that gravitational collapse will involve low energy states whereas electromagnetic singularities involve high energy states and a constant velocity. It could also be assumed that at the singularity, within its frame of reference, we could reach absolute zero and zero velocity.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



Offline Pmb

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1838
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Physicist
    • New England Science Constortium
Re: Electromagnetic singularity
« Reply #1 on: 24/09/2013 21:35:34 »
Quote
We have a theory of the gravitational singularity. This involves time dilation and length contraction among other properties. At this point physics breaks down.
[\quote]
Sure. It has an infinite energy density just like a black hole. It has energy right? It has zero spatial extension, right? Therefore the energy density must be infinite where the photon is (Bill S wouldn't like this :))
« Last Edit: 25/09/2013 21:22:17 by Pmb »
Logged
 

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6996
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 192 times
  • The graviton sucks
Re: Electromagnetic singularity
« Reply #2 on: 25/09/2013 07:27:56 »
Quote from: Pmb on 24/09/2013 21:35:34
Quote from: jeffreyH on 24/09/2013 18:59:18
We have a theory of the gravitational singularity. This involves time dilation and length contraction among other properties. At this point physics breaks down.
[\quote]
Sure. It has an infinite energy density just like a black hole. It has energy right? It has zero spatial extension, right? Therefore the energy density must be infinite where the photon is (Bill S wouldn't like this :))

If we could find a commonality between the gravitational and electromagnetic singularities then we may have the theory of everything and unify all the fields and forces. This does throw up an anomaly. It appears to me that as the electromagnetic spectrum relates to the electron then gravity may relate to the atomic nuclei. The nucleus involves strong forces and if these are the source of gravitation then they produce an externally weak force.
« Last Edit: 25/09/2013 07:36:20 by jeffreyH »
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6996
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 192 times
  • The graviton sucks
Re: Electromagnetic singularity
« Reply #3 on: 25/09/2013 07:50:05 »
This from wikipedia.

[1. Electric charges attract or repel one another with a force inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them: unlike charges attract, like ones repel.

2. Magnetic poles (or states of polarization at individual points) attract or repel one another in a similar way and always come in pairs: every north pole is yoked to a south pole.

3. An electric current in a wire creates a circular magnetic field around the wire, its direction (clockwise or counter-clockwise) depending on that of the current.

4. A current is induced in a loop of wire when it is moved towards or away from a magnetic field, or a magnet is moved towards or away from it, the direction of current depending on that of the movement.]

In item 1 we have our inverse square law for electric charges that echoes gravitation. This involves a particle (the electron) which in turn produces the field. It may be likely that gravity isn't actually propagated directly by a particle but indirectly because of a particles momentum which then produces the gravitational field. As in electromagnetism it is likely that this can be either positive or negative in nature.

Could there be gravitational radiation?
« Last Edit: 25/09/2013 07:52:08 by jeffreyH »
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.167 seconds with 32 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.