The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Non Life Sciences
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
Can the vector operator (DeL) transform to a scalar operator?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Can the vector operator (DeL) transform to a scalar operator?
0 Replies
2749 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Richard777
(OP)
Sr. Member
191
Activity:
0%
Can the vector operator (DeL) transform to a scalar operator?
«
on:
15/03/2019 18:15:40 »
If; the vector operator (DeL) transforms to a scalar operator,
Then;
divergence may transform to a dot product
curl may transform to a cross product
The Maxwell equations include four laws, two divergence laws and two curl laws. The four laws are;
The Gauss Law,
the Magnetic Law,
the Faraday Law,
the Ampere Law.
These laws may be re-written for gravity. Gravitoelectromagnetism (GEM) compares the “Maxwell field equations” for electromagnetism with similar field equations for gravity. This comparison includes “gravitational magnetism” (gravitomagnetism) which is the assumed distortion of a gravitational field due to the motion of a massive object. Mass is analogous to charge.
If DeL does transform, then the Maxwell Equations for gravity may transform as follows;
The Gauss Law transforms to the acceleration rule
The Magnetic Law transforms to the size rule
The Faraday Law transforms to the force rule
The Ampere Law transforms to the power rule.
Will a scalar transformation of Del and GEM give equivalent scalar rules?
«
Last Edit: 15/03/2019 18:23:02 by
Richard777
»
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...