The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Why is glass transparent but graphite (carbon) is not?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why is glass transparent but graphite (carbon) is not?

  • 2 Replies
  • 4522 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline memoryerase1 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 11
  • Activity:
    0%
Why is glass transparent but graphite (carbon) is not?
« on: 07/01/2016 22:50:55 »
... does the carbon not transmit light.
If they are both made from the same noncrystalline atomic structure.
Say for a minute the carbon CAN (I am not sure) have its atoms to be in a noncrystalline network just like the glass.
So the carbon is a amorphous solid made from noncrystalline, just like the four inch cubed glass, yet its electrons absorb light why.
Or maybe I should be asking why the carbons electrons are absorbing light, but in the four inch cubed glass the electrons are not absorbing light.
The carbon, and glass atoms are arranged in the same non crystalline network, why is carbon absorbing atoms.
Thank you for your help, anything helps even if it is a few words.
« Last Edit: 08/01/2016 08:02:56 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3743
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 531 times
Re: If two four inch cubed elements of glass, and carbon are noncrystalline, why?
« Reply #1 on: 08/01/2016 00:55:15 »
Carbon definitely forms amorphous solids (that's essentially what makes up most charcoal). The  key to interactions with light is not just the position of the atoms, but how the electrons are shared between the atoms. In glassy carbon, there are many possible electron transitions over the whole range of visible light (which is why it looks black). However, in very highly ordered crystalline carbon (diamond) there are no transitions that can absorb visible light, so pure diamonds are colorless (and transparent if high enough quality!) Introducing small impurities into diamond changes the electronic structure, such that diamond that has a small amount of boron in it appears blue (like the Hope diamond).
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: memoryerase1

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11033
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: If two four inch cubed elements of glass, and carbon are noncrystalline, why?
« Reply #2 on: 08/01/2016 06:01:20 »
Quote
why the carbons electrons are absorbing light, but in the four inch cubed glass the electrons are not absorbing light?
Adding to the comments by chiralSPO...
3D Amorphous Carbon in the form of charcoal, or 2D crystalline carbon in the form of graphene is a fairly conductive material. There is a "sea" of electrons which are shared among many atoms.

A consequence of Pauli's Exclusion Principle is that no 2 electrons can share the same energy level. In a material like this, there is not just a single energy level for outer electrons, but a "band" of energies which are shared among all the electrons. This means that no matter what energy a photon has, it will quickly hit an electron with just the right energy to absorb it. This results in a black material (although it takes many layers of graphene to become totally opaque).

However, silicon dioxide in glass is an insulator, each molecule tightly holding onto its own electrons. In this case, the electrons do not see the atoms of adjacent molecules so strongly, and the electron energies are more tightly confined. Silicon Dioxide does not absorb much in the visible range (but it does absorb in parts of the ultraviolet and infra-red spectrum).
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: memoryerase1



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.466 seconds with 37 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.