The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Is introspection a reliable scientific method?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Is introspection a reliable scientific method?

  • 45 Replies
  • 23941 Views
  • 1 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dlorde

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1454
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 14 times
  • ex human-biologist & software developer
Re: Is introspection a reliable scientific method?
« Reply #40 on: 12/07/2016 14:17:07 »
Quote from: PhysBang on 12/07/2016 13:25:57
While I agree that cannabis likely has little causal impact on schizophrenia disorders, it is foolish to ignore the reality of these disorders.
Yes, heavy cannabis use appears to be associated with some disorders, but as I understand it, those sufferers often show a predisposition to the disorder (genetic, e.g. familial, or long-term behavioural predictors).

It's not always clear in which direction the correlation is causal (if indeed it is) - are such personality types more likely to self-medicate with cannabis? does cannabis trigger psychosis in the predisposed? can cannabis cause psychosis? or is it some combination of the above?

The other confounding factor is the type and strength of cannabis involved. In the 1960's and '70's, a wide variety of cannabis was imported from Asia and India, mainly as varieties of hash, including oil. Herbal cannabis was a far lower percentage of the market than it is today. All these forms were rich in cannabinoids and relatively lower in THC than many modern strains. Cultivation of herbal cannabis and breeding programmes to increase the strength of the product have markedly reduced the percentage of cannabinoids in favour of extremely high THC levels in varieties like Skunk.

Cannabinoids have been shown to have protective effects against THC-related psychosis, and it may be the huge reduction in cannabinoids in 'super-strength' varieties that is behind the apparent rise in diagnoses - I say apparent rise, because it's possible that some of this reported increase may be due to greater diagnosis with cannabis posited as contributory, and some may simply be due to wider reporting via the internet (social media, etc).

What is clear is that, for the vast majority of cannabis users, there are no significant health effects of long-term regular use other than those attributable to the unfortunate habit of mixing it with tobacco.
Logged
 



Offline smart (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2459
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 38 times
    • Website
Re: Is introspection a reliable scientific method?
« Reply #41 on: 12/07/2016 14:21:27 »
Quote from: PhysBang on 12/07/2016 14:04:53
I'm sorry that I did not notice before the you got sucked in by the Scientology cult. I am sorry for you and I hope you make it ok.

LOL. Could you please enlighten us why you think I'm a scientologist? I'm fascinated by how you connect "Scientology" to introspection in general.
Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 

Offline smart (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2459
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 38 times
    • Website
Re: Is introspection a reliable scientific method?
« Reply #42 on: 03/10/2016 12:05:33 »
Is cognitive introspection a form of scientific meditation ? Can THC-mediated introspection be used to meditate about metacognitive subjects not accessible without chemical activation of CB1 receptors? I believe cognitive introspection is a form of scientific method to gain access to higher functions of consciousness, including imagination and critical thinking.
Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 

Offline smart (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2459
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 38 times
    • Website
Re: Is introspection a reliable scientific method?
« Reply #43 on: 16/10/2016 21:48:10 »
What is meditation exactly?

I believe endocannabinoid synthesis can trigger meditation and cognitive introspection
via intracellular CB1 receptor activation.

Higher levels of consciousness exists and depends on neuronal phase coherence
to hypercompute reality.

Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 

Offline JeffreySharp

  • First timers
  • *
  • 2
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Is introspection a reliable scientific method?
« Reply #44 on: 14/07/2017 16:38:05 »
I'm curious how the topic of the forum about introspection was replaced by a debate about the influence of the cannabis on schizophrenia and Scientology? You have completely reworked the topic.
Logged
 



Offline smart (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2459
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 38 times
    • Website
Re: Is introspection a reliable scientific method?
« Reply #45 on: 17/07/2017 15:56:44 »
Quote from: JeffreySharp on 14/07/2017 16:38:05
I'm curious how the topic of the forum about introspection was replaced by a debate about the influence of the cannabis on schizophrenia and Scientology? You have completely reworked the topic.

It's not me who hijacked the thread with Scientology stuff.
Logged
Not all who wander are lost...
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: introspection 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.344 seconds with 38 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.