The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. The Environment
  4. If nuts vanished how many species would be in trouble?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

If nuts vanished how many species would be in trouble?

  • 2 Replies
  • 2969 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6996
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 192 times
  • The graviton sucks
If nuts vanished how many species would be in trouble?
« on: 21/05/2017 17:09:00 »
If one year we suddenly had no more nuts how many species would be struggling for food? How many depend exclusively on nuts?
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
Re: If nuts vanished how many species would be in trouble?
« Reply #1 on: 23/05/2017 08:20:52 »
New theories would die off very quickly.


In the animal kingdom many nut eaters are not exclusively so in areas where nuts are seasonal. Problem for them would be that nuts are high in fats so energy dense and finding substitutes would be hard.
Some birds are very specialised - specific bill shape - and might have trouble adapting, I suspect it's worth looking at those to see what might be vulnerable. Despite its name the nuthatch eats nuts, seeds and insects.
This seems quite specialised http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p006txss
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 
The following users thanked this post: jeffreyH

Offline chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3743
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 531 times
Re: If nuts vanished how many species would be in trouble?
« Reply #2 on: 23/05/2017 14:42:32 »
Quote from: Colin2B on 23/05/2017 08:20:52
New theories would die off very quickly.

LOL!

Look up "acorn masting." As I understand it, oak trees are able to coordinate how large their acorn (nut) yields are, so that some years there are far more acorns than could possibly be eaten (around here squirrels do most of the eating), allowing them to take root in high yields, while in other years, the trees collude to produce very few acorns, preventing population booms of acorn -eating animals.

Most acorn-eaters have other options, so extinction is a highly unlikely outcome for a single year of restricted supply. But a sharp drop in the amount of available food in nut form would surely impact the population.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: jeffreyH



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.339 seconds with 30 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.