The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. The second mistake of the mathematicians, after pi
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

The second mistake of the mathematicians, after pi

  • 25 Replies
  • 7425 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The second mistake of the mathematicians, after pi
« Reply #20 on: 14/09/2017 21:48:36 »
Quote from: aetzbar on 14/09/2017 21:33:36
do you know that there is no mathematical formula for lines?
Did you know you are talking nonsense?
y=mx+c
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline aetzbar (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 260
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: The second mistake of the mathematicians, after pi
« Reply #21 on: 14/09/2017 22:45:08 »
The formula you describe describes the position of points in the plane.
Can you view a formula that describes a line?
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The second mistake of the mathematicians, after pi
« Reply #22 on: 16/09/2017 00:49:23 »
Quote from: aetzbar on 14/09/2017 22:45:08
The formula you describe describes the position of points in the plane.
Can you view a formula that describes a line?
Not that it's important to the OP;
What's the difference?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest4091

  • Guest
Re: The second mistake of the mathematicians, after pi
« Reply #23 on: 16/09/2017 17:56:52 »
Quote from: aetzbar on 14/09/2017 22:45:08

If pi was incorrect, engineers who develop jet engines for example, would have discovered it decades ago with catastrophic engine failures.
Logged
 

Offline aetzbar (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 260
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: The second mistake of the mathematicians, after pi
« Reply #24 on: 16/09/2017 18:30:38 »
The idea of pi changes, has no effect on technology practice.
The effect is on the mathematicians' perception of reality.
They determined and even proved a wrong idea, which they teach for hundreds of years.
Mathematicians delayed the development of geometry.
This geometry produces a new fixed number (1.007) that will also appear in the physical field
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The second mistake of the mathematicians, after pi
« Reply #25 on: 16/09/2017 22:02:46 »
Quote from: aetzbar on 16/09/2017 18:30:38
The idea of pi changes, has no effect on technology practice.
The effect is on the mathematicians' perception of reality.
They determined and even proved a wrong idea, which they teach for hundreds of years.
Mathematicians delayed the development of geometry.
This geometry produces a new fixed number (1.007) that will also appear in the physical field

That's plainly nonsense.
Why do you keep saying it?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.662 seconds with 35 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.