The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Grand Unification within the Standard Model
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Grand Unification within the Standard Model

  • 1 Replies
  • 2073 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LabLad (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Grand Unification within the Standard Model
« on: 07/10/2017 18:08:37 »
Ever since the electroweak unification was achieved and subsequently proven, theoretical particle

physicists were working on uniting the strong nuclear force as well in what is commonly known as

Grand Unification. Instead of coming up with a new Grand Unification Theory I came up with a solution

to unite the fundamental coupling constants within the Standard Model of particle physics.

I began with a desire to remove the Landau Pole from the running of the fine structure constant and

accidentally discovered an equation that unites it, the fine structure constant aka the QED coupling

constant, and the strong nuclear coupling constant. Effectively I borrowed the asymptotic freedom

from QCD and borrowed it to QED.

The problem here is of course that QCD is an SU(3) non-abelian theory and QED is an U(1) theory.

Fortunately the Standard model is made of SU(3) X SU(2) X U(1) and I involved parts of both the

electroweak SU(2) X U(1) and the strong SU(3) interactions by effectively connecting the most

fundamental parameters from these interactions such as the Higgs vacuum expectation value and the QCD

integration constant after which I applied beta expansion instead of working directly with beta

functions which improved the measuring for the running of the strong coupling constant on a Q scale.

After which I united the running of the fine structure constant on a Q scale to the running of the

strong coupling constant on a Q scale. All my results are in great agreement with the experimental

values and the yet untested prediction of the Standard Model. Additionally I made a new predition

that would be easy to test hence proving (or disproving) my method for Grand Unification of gauge

coupling parameters.

Take a look at the results in the image attached and tell me what you think. I'll send a draft to any interested parties, for now my paper is on hold on arxiv but I put it up on academia too.

Best Regards, Nikola.

* 123456789.jpg (121.19 kB, 694x466 - viewed 205 times.)
Logged
 



Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6996
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 192 times
  • The graviton sucks
Re: Grand Unification within the Standard Model
« Reply #1 on: 09/10/2017 13:05:27 »
What about quantum triviality?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_triviality
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.511 seconds with 34 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.