The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. The science of a t.v licence
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]   Go Down

The science of a t.v licence

  • 105 Replies
  • 26754 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21160
  • Activity:
    64%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: The science of a t.v licence
« Reply #100 on: 03/03/2018 13:35:18 »
Broadcast TV signals are photons. You need a licence to receive them. What's the problem?
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The science of a t.v licence
« Reply #101 on: 03/03/2018 13:39:36 »

All the talk of carriers and photons makes no difference.
This is still wrong.
Quote from: Thebox on 02/03/2018 12:20:14
I already said earlier the thread they are charging us a license fee to detect light,

What gets transmitted and detected is a radio wave, not light.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The science of a t.v licence
« Reply #102 on: 03/03/2018 13:46:32 »
Quote from: The Spoon on 03/03/2018 13:29:32
Quote from: Thebox on 03/03/2018 13:17:41
Quote from: Bored chemist on 03/03/2018 13:15:27
Quote from: Thebox on 03/03/2018 13:07:24
It is electromagnetic radiation, it is non-observable light by the eye, television emitted wave-lengths of light are what we detect in our brains as pictures.
You know that.
So, the bit about a carrier was just you putting a "sciency sounding" word in for no reason.
Why do you do that?
Electromagnetic waves are carrier signals, it contains information at the right frequency . 
But you said specifically that photons are the carrier.
Well they are technically, they are super cool bits of information, information that can be detected and decoded by the brain or device.
But when I say photon, I am talking about field perturbations and energy spikes  travelling through the field. 

Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The science of a t.v licence
« Reply #103 on: 03/03/2018 13:47:39 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 03/03/2018 13:39:36

All the talk of carriers and photons makes no difference.
This is still wrong.
Quote from: Thebox on 02/03/2018 12:20:14
I already said earlier the thread they are charging us a license fee to detect light,

What gets transmitted and detected is a radio wave, not light.
hmm, a radio wave is light as well dude. Of the invisible spectrum type.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The science of a t.v licence
« Reply #104 on: 03/03/2018 14:19:59 »
Quote from: Thebox on 03/03/2018 13:47:39
a radio wave is light
No
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The science of a t.v licence
« Reply #105 on: 03/03/2018 14:28:00 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 03/03/2018 14:19:59
Quote from: Thebox on 03/03/2018 13:47:39
a radio wave is light
No

Stop being stupid

Radio waves are a type of electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths in the electromagnetic spectrum longer than infrared light. ... At 300 GHz, the corresponding wavelength is 1 mm (0.039 in), and at 3 kHz is 100 km (62 mi). Like all other electromagnetic waves, they travel at the speed of light.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.532 seconds with 40 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.