The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Inviting comments from NASA, EHT, on contention NO BLACK HOLE EXISTS ?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]   Go Down

Inviting comments from NASA, EHT, on contention NO BLACK HOLE EXISTS ?

  • 81 Replies
  • 16383 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Inviting comments from NASA, EHT, on contention NO BLACK HOLE EXISTS ?
« Reply #80 on: 25/02/2019 19:45:01 »
Quote from: jsaldea12 on 19/02/2019 04:13:34
Nevertheless both  have inherent positive and negative property,
Why do you make up dross like that?
Quote from: jsaldea12 on 18/02/2019 23:23:57
How LIGO works? I KNOW!!! jsaldea12Feb. 18, 2019.
Then why do you keep saying things that are wrong?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Inviting comments from NASA, EHT, on contention NO BLACK HOLE EXISTS ?
« Reply #81 on: 25/02/2019 19:46:47 »
Quote from: jsaldea12 on 24/02/2019 23:49:23
ead between the lines  of Hawking and mine and know both are  one and the same.
No, they differ by at least a factor of 1,000,000,000,000,000 or so.
That's quite wrong.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: jsaldea12 roxas city  / philippines 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.323 seconds with 26 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.