The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Pixilated images
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Pixilated images

  • 5 Replies
  • 7615 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

paul.fr

  • Guest
Pixilated images
« on: 07/05/2007 06:49:31 »
Sometimes on the news they will pixilate a persons face. But if i squint whilst looking at the image i can make the face out. Why is that?
Logged
 



Offline Batroost

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 276
  • Activity:
    0%
  • There's no such thing as a dirty atom!
Pixilated images
« Reply #1 on: 07/05/2007 13:09:19 »
Ok, I think this is to do with spatial filtering...

One of the things that's important in optics is the concept of spatial frequency. This isn't the same as the light's frequency - which determines its colour - but is instead a way of describing an image. Every image can be treated as a mixture of simple repeating patterns. This is similar to the idea that any sound wave can be built-up from a variety of simpler sine waves of different frequencies. An image composed of a regular grid might only have a single spatial frequency, a more complicated image will have lots.

Now here's the odd bit. When light passes through a lens an image is transformed into a 'map' of its own spatial frequencies. This is known as a Fourier Trransform. Those components of an image that have a low spatial frequency will be closest to the focal point, those with a higher frequency will be further out from the centre of the beam. So, one of the tricks in optics is to put a tight mechanical iris around a beam, just at the focal point of a lens, and thereby remove all of the higher frequency components of an image. This will, for example, remove a 'pixelated' effect from an image.

When you squint you restrict the size of the aperture through which light must pass to get into your eye. This isn't ideal spatial filtering as it is the wrong side of the lens, and the cornea (which does a lot of the light bending) complicates things still fuirther. However, what I believe you are doing is a crude form of filtering that removes the regular pixelated effect from the image and smears out the data in a way that the brain more readily processes as a face.

Sound reasonable?
Logged
Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think.
 

Marked as best answer by on Yesterday at 18:25:19

Offline daveshorts

  • Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • *****
  • 2568
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Physics, Experiments
    • http://www.chaosscience.org.uk
  • Undo Best Answer
  • Pixilated images
    « Reply #2 on: 07/05/2007 18:56:40 »
    This could be because your brain tends to split the world into objects- if there are lots of hard edges it sees the pixels as individual objects, but if you blur the picture it softens the edges so you see the groups of the pixels better.
    Logged
     

    Offline JimBob

    • Global Moderator
    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ********
    • 6543
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 9 times
    • Moderator
    Pixilated images
    « Reply #3 on: 08/05/2007 03:08:09 »
    Like me, your eyes are bad in just the right way - or your brain is mis-processing the image. It could be the time we spend staring at our computer screens. Heck, I don't really know. I just wanted to bug you!!

    Heh, heh,heh, (chokes on spittle from his drool)
    Logged
    The mind is like a parachute. It works best when open.  -- A. Einstein
     

    Offline RD

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 9094
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 163 times
    Pixilated images
    « Reply #4 on: 08/05/2007 16:31:46 »
    It is vitally important for an individual to differentiate friend from foe: there is strong pressure to evolve an acute ability to recognise faces. 

    The brain is "hard wired" to recognise faces: demonstrated by the fact that injury to a specific part of the brain causes "face blindness" (Prosopagnosia)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosopagnosia
    Logged
     



    Offline neilep

    • Withdrawnmist
    • Global Moderator
    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • ********
    • 21211
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 119 times
    Pixilated images
    « Reply #5 on: 08/05/2007 17:08:59 »
    Quote from: paul.fr on 07/05/2007 06:49:31
    Sometimes on the news they will pixilate a persons face. But if i squint whilst looking at the image i can make the face out. Why is that?

    This is cool..I will try this next time I see it on TV.
    Logged
    Men are the same as Women, just inside out !
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.844 seconds with 40 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.