The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Is high-temperature combustion a safe way to deal with plastic waste?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is high-temperature combustion a safe way to deal with plastic waste?

  • 2 Replies
  • 2592 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DanQuestions (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 8
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Is high-temperature combustion a safe way to deal with plastic waste?
« on: 19/08/2019 12:31:40 »
To deal with plastic waste are these 2 ideas possible?

1: People are against burning waste to produce electricity because of the pollution it causes, but if the temperature was hot enough could it not break down the molecules until they become atoms again, therefore not releasing any harmful gasses?

2: Would it be possible to compress waste in to small cubes so it could be easily stored?

« Last Edit: 19/08/2019 15:47:32 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31102
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Is high-temperature combustion a safe way to deal with plastic waste?
« Reply #1 on: 20/08/2019 20:17:56 »
High temperature incineration is used to destroy some materials, but (ironically) you usually have to add additional fuel to get things hot enough.

Even them you still have to deal with things like chlorine and sulphur in the feedstock which can cause corrosion problems.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21167
  • Activity:
    61%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Is high-temperature combustion a safe way to deal with plastic waste?
« Reply #2 on: 20/08/2019 22:45:43 »
I've always found it annoying to throw away polymerised alkanes whilst having to pay through the nose for AVGAS, diesel and oil with pretty much the same energy density. Surely there must be a bored chemist out there who can turn scrap plastic back into useful liquid hydrocarbons! 

Alternatively, several coalfired power stations burn coal slurry - essentially, water pumped out of coal mine sumps with a high content of combustible particulates, or "fluidised" coal dust. It should be possible to freeze and grind plastic waste into a similar material with a large surface area that can be burned usefully, or at worst, used to "enrich" a gas flame. The corrosive bits are only a problem if you don't anticipate them (use a ceramic combustion chamber and chimney) or account for corrosion in your lifetime cost planning of the facility. 
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.419 seconds with 37 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.