The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. Why do we share so much DNA with chimpanzees but not with Neanderthals?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why do we share so much DNA with chimpanzees but not with Neanderthals?

  • 1 Replies
  • 5118 Views
  • 5 Tags

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline amalia (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 48
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Why do we share so much DNA with chimpanzees but not with Neanderthals?
« on: 11/12/2019 12:38:43 »
Tim contacted us with the following question:
If we share 99% of our DNA with chimpanzees then we must logically share say around 99.7% of our DNA with Neanderthals and perhaps 99.6% with Denisovans. So why do scientists say we only share 2% or 4% of our DNA with Neanderthals and Denisovans?
Do you know the answer?
Logged
 



Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2404
  • Activity:
    6%
  • Thanked: 1015 times
Re: Why do we share so much DNA with chimpanzees but not with Neanderthals?
« Reply #1 on: 11/12/2019 14:10:09 »
The 2-4% figure is the likely amount of parentage Neanderthals make up in our ancestry.
So if you go back enough generations in your family tree, 2-4% of the ancestors are pure Neanderthal.  That can't be correct because there are people with zero Neanderthal ancestry still living, but even those share well over 99% of the DNA with them since the two sub-species share a common ancestry at some point (a point recent enough that the two could interbreed).  That's not saying anything, since humans and tulips share a common ancestry if you go back far enough, but that's far enough that we share far far less DNA with a tulip, and no tulip was ever my ancestor.
« Last Edit: 11/12/2019 14:14:12 by Halc »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: dna  / chimpanzees  / neanderthals  / denisovans  / evolution 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.22 seconds with 28 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.