The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Is consciousness fundamental?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is consciousness fundamental?

  • 5 Replies
  • 3193 Views
  • 4 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline psyclone (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 2
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Is consciousness fundamental?
« on: 07/06/2020 09:22:38 »
Hi, first post here, so please disregard any unintended tribe trespassings in formats etc.
Note: I am just a general interest member, and english is not my native language.

The title question is meant as an overarch to what I am looking for. I recently read Donald D. Hoffmans "The case against reality", and it left me hungry for more of the same. I was especially intrigued with some of the material in the book which made me make the connection to the (spiritual) understanding of the nature of consciousness as found in some buddhist paradigms.
I guess I don´t need to split hairs to explain to this crowd, so here goes: Can anyone recommend any sites / forums / sources for reading more about the scientific development / work on the subject of consciousness and reality? I am familiar with "the Consciousness Project" at Princeton, for example, but to me, this seems more of a think-tanky and narrow initiative.

Are there (except from mentioned book and author) any scientific societies or institutions currently working actively on other and alternative approaches to "the fabric of physical reality" apart from "fundamental particles as real components in a time/space universe"?

Thanks, and sorry for any syntax friction.
« Last Edit: 18/06/2020 10:45:26 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21159
  • Activity:
    67%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Is consciousness fundamental?
« Reply #1 on: 07/06/2020 10:45:03 »
Welcome! I have no positive recommendations but a word of caution.

Be very critical of texts that mention "observer effects". Many physics textbooks use the term "observer" to mean "anything that is changed by an event". A lot of amateurs take the word literally, and assume it means that consciousness, however you define it, affects the result of an experiment - you will come across this particularly in the "double slit experiment".

In many classic experiments the "observer" was a photographic film, so either the film was sufficiently psychic to know that a human was going to look at it some time later, or consciousness is irrelevant.

And full marks for a clear exposition of the question!
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 
The following users thanked this post: psyclone

Offline psyclone (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 2
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Is consciousness fundamental?
« Reply #2 on: 07/06/2020 11:56:55 »
Thank you, good Sir!
Very good point. I guess I intuitively "know" this from somewhere, but I can see how awareness of this fact not only helps any understanding, but also keeps you on the right side of the road.
Logged
 

Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3630
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 114 times
Re: Is consciousness fundamental?
« Reply #3 on: 10/06/2020 20:47:34 »
https://www.brainpickings.org/2015/09/29/david-bohm-jiddu-krishnamurti-ending-of-time-love-intelligence/

I have no personal experience of this book, but there might be something there for you. 
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3630
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 114 times
Re: Is consciousness fundamental?
« Reply #4 on: 10/06/2020 21:15:23 »
Wolf. Fred Alan,  The Yoga of Time Travel.   Quest Books, Wheaton, Illinois.  2004.
Taylor. Steve, Making Time. Icon Books Ltd. Cambridge, UK. 2008.
Some unconventional ideas in these books. 

Wertheim. Margaret,  God of the Quantum Vacuum.  New Scientist,   04.10.1997. might be worth a look, as well.
 
Large “pinch of salt” recommended in all cases. :)
Logged
There never was nothing.
 



Offline remotemass

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 95
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Is consciousness fundamental?
« Reply #5 on: 18/06/2020 06:29:40 »
You might find interesting Christopher Michael Langan's book - The Art of Knowing: Expositions on Free Will and Selected Essays.
He is well known for his very high Mensa tested IQ and CTMU theory (Cognitive Theoretic Model Of The Universe).
Logged
Creator of CubicPostcode | Transforming the way we address geographic locations
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: donald hoffman  / consciousness  / reality  / god 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.175 seconds with 42 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.