The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Discussion & Feedback
  3. Just Chat!
  4. Have astronomers stopped using Ergs per second
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Have astronomers stopped using Ergs per second

  • 6 Replies
  • 1677 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline syhprum (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 5198
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 74 times
Have astronomers stopped using Ergs per second
« on: 30/11/2020 14:01:43 »
I have just been reading an article on CNO energy in the Sun , I was pleasently surprised to see the Suns output quoted in Watts instead of the more usual Ergs per second .
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21159
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Have astronomers stopped using Ergs per second
« Reply #1 on: 30/11/2020 14:44:14 »
Quote
The erg has not been a valid unit since 1 January 1978
which suggests that most of the astronomers who published in erg/sec have indeed been prevented from doing so by death. In fact the SI unit was preferred way back in 1970, but it took the EU a while to wake up.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline syhprum (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 5198
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 74 times
Re: Have astronomers stopped using Ergs per second
« Reply #2 on: 01/12/2020 05:47:57 »
Will we ever se the back of Angstroms ?
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Have astronomers stopped using Ergs per second
« Reply #3 on: 01/12/2020 09:03:04 »
Quote from: syhprum on 01/12/2020 05:47:57
Will we ever se the back of Angstroms ?
We are inching away from them.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11035
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Have astronomers stopped using Ergs per second
« Reply #4 on: 01/12/2020 09:10:21 »
"Barns" have a rustic ring to them...
Quote from: Wikipedia
"couldn't hit the broad side of a barn"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barn_(unit)
Logged
 



Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
Re: Have astronomers stopped using Ergs per second
« Reply #5 on: 01/12/2020 13:08:19 »
Quote from: evan_au on 01/12/2020 09:10:21
"Barns" have a rustic ring to them...
Quote from: Wikipedia
"couldn't hit the broad side of a barn"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barn_(unit)
Who said scientists have no sense of humour?
Check out shake (unit) as in "2 shakes of a lamb's tail" and atom bomb
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Have astronomers stopped using Ergs per second
« Reply #6 on: 01/12/2020 13:22:51 »
Quote from: evan_au on 01/12/2020 09:10:21
"Barns" have a rustic ring to them...
Quote from: Wikipedia
"couldn't hit the broad side of a barn"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barn_(unit)
Part of a composite unit of energy
The barn. yard. atmosphere is a small amount of energy (About 9.3 X 10^24 Joules).
The yard is a unit of distance and the barn is an area so a barn . yard is a volume and since pressure can be measured in atmospheres a barn . yard . atmosphere is a pressure times a volume and that has units of energy.


« Last Edit: 01/12/2020 13:28:31 by Bored chemist »
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.462 seconds with 42 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.