The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Does this solve dark matter
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Does this solve dark matter

  • 4 Replies
  • 4614 Views
  • 1 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline radonphysics23 (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Does this solve dark matter
« on: 01/06/2021 13:48:16 »
Hypothesis:

Dark matter is the fabric of spacetime itself.



When I speak about spacetime, I am referring to the fabric of spacetime.



This theory will alter the big bang in that spacetime existed before the big bang. Or another option is the big bang first released a large amount of empty spacetime at the beginning before it created matter within later spacetime. Think of a soap bubble, the bubble itself is expanding empty spacetime while the air inside is expanding spacetime with matter in it. I believe an empty vacuum of spacetime existed first, and the big bang happend in it.



Gravity effects spacetime by curving it as Einstein stated. Therefore the fabric of spacetime we can assume has mass. The curving is actually spacetime being compacted by higher gravity of the mass of matter. This means light will curve but spacetime is actually being compressed at the center of an object like a black hole, and therefore it must be stretched at a distance from the object.



The mass of spacetime is small. But since a galaxy is mostly empty spacetime, the mass of spacetime at that scale would be large. With the gravity of the matter in the galaxy attracting more spacetime, the mass of spacetime in the galaxy would increase to an equilibrium. This gathers enough spacetime(and its mass) to hold the out most matter in orbit.



Dark energy is said to be pushing the galaxy apart, but if empty spacetime exists outside the expanding bubble of the universe, the gravity of that spacetime would be pulling it apart instead.



I believe all proven physics is not broken by this theory. The mass of spacetime on a small scale would be negligible so Newtonian physics and General Relativity is still accurate at their scale. GR will need to account for the mass of spacetime at much larger scales though.



Some questions to be pondered:

1) How compacted can spacetime be and how stretched?

2) As spacetime is stretched and compressed how does it effect light?

3) As a black hole spins does it twist spacetime also? Is spacetime dragged around the black hole or just simply compacted in the center do to mass?

4) What is gravity exactly? (LOL  naturally) Could it be a dimesion as time is?




I hope this explains my theory well enough. I am not a physicist, just fascinated by relativity and quantum physics. But of all the theories I have read and studied, I believe this explains dark matter(and dark energy) better and simpler. I also do not have the expertise to do the math calculations to prove or disprove this so I am hoping physicists will read this and consider it.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Just thinking



Offline Eternal Student

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1832
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 470 times
Re: Does this solve dark matter
« Reply #1 on: 23/08/2021 19:07:07 »
Hi.

Quote from: radonphysics23 on 01/06/2021 13:48:16
Dark energy is said to be pushing the galaxy apart, but if empty spacetime exists outside the expanding bubble of the universe, the gravity of that spacetime would be pulling it apart instead
    It's the idea of being "outside the bubble of the universe"  that worries me.   We have no physics for anything that exists outside the universe.   You seem to be implying that "outside of our universe" is just a place with much the same laws of physics - so it has spacetime and gravity works much the same etc.   That's OK but then it would seem that this place is in fact already included in our definition of "the universe".   Standard Cosmology tries to consider "the Universe" and not just restrict attention to our "observable universe".   In particular, there often are places outside the observable universe in these cosmological models and they look and behave just like the place inside the observable universe.
     
Quote from: radonphysics23 on 01/06/2021 13:48:16
I am hoping physicists will read this and consider it.
   Well I don't work as a physicist for my day job but I have read it and considered it.  Thank you.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Curious Cat

Offline Origin

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2248
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 210 times
  • Nothing of importance
Re: Does this solve dark matter
« Reply #2 on: 24/08/2021 12:39:54 »
Quote from: Curious Cat on 23/08/2021 20:38:07
I think I will address Ur reply next, to clarify this universal/cosmic confusion, once and for all, time.
Here is my prediction:  you won't clear up anything and you will continue to post off topic/useless posts.
Logged
 

Offline BilboGrabbins

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 119
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Does this solve dark matter
« Reply #3 on: 24/08/2021 17:40:06 »
Quote from: radonphysics23 on 01/06/2021 13:48:16
Hypothesis:

Dark matter is the fabric of spacetime itself.



When I speak about spacetime, I am referring to the fabric of spacetime.





I'll cut it short. Classical physics says spacetime is an empty vacuum. Quantum physics says otherwise to the point there is no such thing as empty space.

Observable calculation of vacuum is of order 10^120 magnitudes of error. The remaining unobservable energy might be encoded in the ground state of the vacuum from off-shell particles, known also as virtual particles, which do have real effects in spacetime. One promiment argument why we cannot observe these dark energy effects is because these ground state fluctuations normally have a lifespan too short to be observable. We can detect them though indirectly using very special mechines, so we know it's there.

So to answer your question, yes, the vacuum may be linked in this way to dark matter effects.
« Last Edit: 24/08/2021 18:34:01 by BilboGrabbins »
Logged
 

Offline Just thinking

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1009
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 144 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Does this solve dark matter
« Reply #4 on: 28/08/2021 20:18:29 »
Quote from: radonphysics23 on 01/06/2021 13:48:16
The mass of spacetime is small. But since a galaxy is mostly empty spacetime, the mass of spacetime at that scale would be large. With the gravity of the matter in the galaxy attracting more spacetime, the mass of spacetime in the galaxy would increase to an equilibrium. This gathers enough spacetime(and its mass) to hold the out most matter in orbit.

This is very plausible and likely as it explains the current understanding and physical universe. Thanks for your post.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: dark matter 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.302 seconds with 45 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.