The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. The Cold Big Bang
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

The Cold Big Bang

  • 46 Replies
  • 8509 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The Cold Big Bang
« Reply #40 on: 13/09/2021 18:56:52 »
Quote from: BilboGrabbins on 13/09/2021 10:17:33
Secondly, this doesn't really have to do with rejection of the misnomer of "initial state," than a well-traced history support that at least one point of the universe was hot.
And that's why you should read stuff through before you post it.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline BilboGrabbins (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 119
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: The Cold Big Bang
« Reply #41 on: 14/09/2021 06:12:02 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 13/09/2021 18:56:52
Quote from: BilboGrabbins on 13/09/2021 10:17:33
Secondly, this doesn't really have to do with rejection of the misnomer of "initial state," than a well-traced history support that at least one point of the universe was hot.
And that's why you should read stuff through before you post it.

Concerning what exactly?
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The Cold Big Bang
« Reply #42 on: 14/09/2021 09:05:35 »
Could you parse that sentence for us please?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline BilboGrabbins (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 119
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: The Cold Big Bang
« Reply #43 on: 14/09/2021 10:45:25 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/09/2021 09:05:35
Could you parse that sentence for us please?

You said that I need to read more carefully. To what did you have in mind specifically?
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The Cold Big Bang
« Reply #44 on: 14/09/2021 12:34:06 »
The irony...

What I said was

Quote from: Bored chemist on 13/09/2021 18:56:52
you should read stuff through before you post it.


Quote from: BilboGrabbins on 14/09/2021 10:45:25
You said that I need to read more carefully.
You should read the stuff you post, before you post it.
« Last Edit: 14/09/2021 12:36:08 by Bored chemist »
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline BilboGrabbins (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 119
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: The Cold Big Bang
« Reply #45 on: 16/09/2021 07:21:34 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/09/2021 12:34:06
The irony...

What I said was

Quote from: Bored chemist on 13/09/2021 18:56:52
you should read stuff through before you post it.


Quote from: BilboGrabbins on 14/09/2021 10:45:25
You said that I need to read more carefully.
You should read the stuff you post, before you post it.

I often do. So what are you on about?
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The Cold Big Bang
« Reply #46 on: 16/09/2021 08:29:46 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 14/09/2021 09:05:35
Could you parse that sentence for us please?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.375 seconds with 41 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.