The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. What features should a modern new and simplified version of English should have?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

What features should a modern new and simplified version of English should have?

  • 21 Replies
  • 5879 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31102
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: What features should a modern new and simplified version of English should have?
« Reply #20 on: 09/03/2022 08:40:20 »
Quote from: evan_au on 09/03/2022 08:13:34
And some scholars actually encouraged complications like this, as it showed the etymology of the word.
And who are you to say that they were wrong?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21162
  • Activity:
    63.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: What features should a modern new and simplified version of English should have?
« Reply #21 on: 09/03/2022 16:16:29 »
Quote from: evan_au on 09/03/2022 08:13:34
And English spelling is a real hodge-podge.
This is partly ascribed to Caxton's attempts to capture the spoken word and assemble some consensus from written papers, and partly the result of English promiscuity in taking words from other languages. It is possibl too capchur the sounds ov Inglish bei adopting Germanik speling rools but in dooing soe yoo woud looz the etimologi ov Nourman wirdz. And yoo woud  probabli wont to yooz an umlaut okaeznli.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: semanticweb  / deepmind 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.279 seconds with 31 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.