The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Alternative combustibles
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Alternative combustibles

  • 18 Replies
  • 9750 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DoctorBeaver (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Alternative combustibles
« on: 28/06/2007 15:46:00 »
Is there anything that can burn that didn't start its life as a plant or tree? Coal, oil, natural gas, paper, wood, etc - all were once plants or trees.
Logged
 



another_someone

  • Guest
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #1 on: 28/06/2007 16:11:23 »
Most metals will burn (even if the ignition temperature may be higher than for carbon).  The other problem is that in our oxidising environment, few metals (least of all those most likely to combust) naturally exist in unoxidised form, so you first have to reduce them (which requires energy, often from combustion of carbon) in order to obtain their reduced metallic form, which then allows them to oxidise again by burning in air.

Similarly, hydrogen (although that might be regarded as a metal) will burn, but is naturally already found in an oxidised state - namely water.

Phosphorous will burn (although historically, primary source of phosphorous often tended to be from things that were once living - e.g. bones, or urine).  White phosphorus is even self igniting in oxygen.

« Last Edit: 28/06/2007 16:17:57 by another_someone »
Logged
 

Offline dentstudent

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3146
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • FOGger to the unsuspecting
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #2 on: 28/06/2007 16:15:10 »
Non-cellulose based plastics?

Logged
 

another_someone

  • Guest
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #3 on: 28/06/2007 16:19:00 »
Quote from: dentstudent on 28/06/2007 16:15:10
Non-cellulose based plastics?

But most plastics are produced from oil, which is assumed to have originated as plant matter.
Logged
 

Offline dentstudent

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3146
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • FOGger to the unsuspecting
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #4 on: 28/06/2007 16:22:26 »
OK, perhaps what I meant was fully synthetic plastics.
Logged
 



another_someone

  • Guest
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #5 on: 28/06/2007 16:46:27 »
Quote from: dentstudent on 28/06/2007 16:22:26
OK, perhaps what I meant was fully synthetic plastics.

Please explain what that means?

Almost all carbon we use was once plant matter, so any carbon based plastic will at some time most likely have been plant matter.  It is theoretically possible to obtain carbon from extraterrestrial sources, and this carbon is unlikely to have ever been plant matter, but it is not a source of carbon that is presently readily or cheaply available.

Ofcourse, not all plastics need be carbon based - there are also silicon based plastics - but they are not normally combustible.

Logged
 

Offline DoctorBeaver (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #6 on: 28/06/2007 19:29:08 »
So basically the answer to my question is no. That's what I thought.

I first considered this when I started a cooking fire at the stables the other day. I started thinking about what material was normally used for fires & I couldn't think of any that weren't originally plant material.
Logged
 

another_someone

  • Guest
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #7 on: 28/06/2007 20:16:56 »
Quote from: DoctorBeaver on 28/06/2007 19:29:08
So basically the answer to my question is no. That's what I thought.

I first considered this when I started a cooking fire at the stables the other day. I started thinking about what material was normally used for fires & I couldn't think of any that weren't originally plant material.

The point is that in our environment, anything that can be easily oxidised has already been oxidised; so in order that we can obtain something that is not in an oxidised state, it needs to have gone through some chemically reducing process.  The only common chemical reducing process that naturally occurs is photosynthesis.  So, the only naturally occurring materials materials that are not already in an oxidised state, and are capable of oxidation, are likely to have gone through a process of photosynthesis - i.e. they were plant material at one time.

Maybe the only exception to this might be at submarine volcanic vents, where hot reduced matter might be vented, and not having access to air, do not get a chance to oxidise (I am thinking here maybe about sulphur, or hydrogen sulphide).
Logged
 

Offline dentstudent

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3146
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • FOGger to the unsuspecting
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #8 on: 29/06/2007 11:03:50 »
I remember from school chemistry that we had strips of magnesium which would burn very readily. Does this qualify? Also sodium, which reacted strongly in water? Or do both of these have to be reduced as George said earlier?
Logged
 



another_someone

  • Guest
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #9 on: 29/06/2007 11:41:31 »
Quote from: dentstudent on 29/06/2007 11:03:50
I remember from school chemistry that we had strips of magnesium which would burn very readily. Does this qualify? Also sodium, which reacted strongly in water? Or do both of these have to be reduced as George said earlier?

You would not get either as raw metals in the natural environment (Sodium exists in numerous salts, most significantly as Sodium Chloride, which can be reduced to Sodium; and magnesium would I suspect exist predominantly as oxides or sulphates).
Logged
 

Offline eric l

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 514
  • Activity:
    0%
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #10 on: 29/06/2007 16:23:45 »
Quote from: DoctorBeaver on 28/06/2007 15:46:00
Is there anything that can burn that didn't start its life as a plant or tree? Coal, oil, natural gas, paper, wood, etc - all were once plants or trees.
Your phrase "didn't start its life" confirms the general impression that all our fuels are of organic origin.  But not all of vegetable origin.
I remember reading that the Inuit (Eskimo) use(d) cod liver oil and similar substances as fuels, there are probably other fuels of animal origin.  Other example :  bee wax for candles.  But I would qualify the famous buffalo chips as of vegetable origin because ultimately they come from grass.
Logged
"Wonder is no wonder" (Simon Stevin 1548-1620)
 

Offline DoctorBeaver (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #11 on: 29/06/2007 16:29:17 »
Good thinking, Eric. Unfortunately, we don't get many walruses or seals here in central England so blubber is a non-starter for me.
Logged
 

Offline ukmicky

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3065
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
    • http://www.space-talk.com/
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #12 on: 29/06/2007 19:45:16 »
Methane hydrate ,then again no as it use to be organic plant material :)
« Last Edit: 29/06/2007 19:52:36 by ukmicky »
Logged
 



Offline DoctorBeaver (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #13 on: 29/06/2007 19:50:25 »
Doesn't methane ultimately derive from plant material?
Logged
 

Offline ukmicky

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3065
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 7 times
    • http://www.space-talk.com/
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #14 on: 29/06/2007 19:53:24 »
quite right ,You got in before i got my edit finished
Logged
 

Offline DoctorBeaver (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #15 on: 29/06/2007 19:54:43 »
That's made me look stoopit!  [:(]
Logged
 

Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3389
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #16 on: 30/06/2007 23:16:27 »
There are a few that I can think of. 

Firstly there are truly mineral sources of carbon, that is graphite and diamonds.  both are found in meteorites.

Sulphur is also found native and this will burn in air.

Some metals like iron are also found native for example meteoric iron and these will burn if finely divided.
« Last Edit: 30/06/2007 23:22:43 by Soul Surfer »
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 



Offline DoctorBeaver (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #17 on: 30/06/2007 23:18:42 »
Do they burn?
Logged
 

Offline Soul Surfer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3389
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • keep banging the rocks together
    • ian kimber's web workspace
Alternative combustibles
« Reply #18 on: 30/06/2007 23:26:58 »
All will burn in air. sulphur is the easiest to ingnite.  It is possible to make sulphur candles.  These are used for fumigating greenhouses.  Graphite needs to be heated quite hot before it burns but once it starts it will burn quite fiercely.  The windscale reactor fire was a graphite in air fire.
Logged
Learn, create, test and tell
evolution rules in all things
God says so!
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.606 seconds with 68 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.