[yor_on]

Damn* it's kind of fun, but still, what Pete asks is relevant. How will you define it relative the mathematics that exist? I don't think it simplifies myself In the end mathematics is what we use to apply a logic to what nature tells us.

[f.point (OP)]

Theorem - The contact numbers is sorted horizontally to be the only one natural straight line that gives a natural straight line , when there are two (more) results between them becomes a gap.

PROOF -
 [ Invalid Attachment ]






+₂ - addition rule 2

(CM.) - No "addition rule 2"

[PmbPhy]

there is no object that can survive an infinite amount of time, space can survive an infinite length of time.

You don't even know what it means to survive for an infinite amount of time. It means that there is no finite value "t" at which the object "doesn't survive" which is quite wrong. Objects like protons and electrons can as can atoms. There is no time limit on how long they can exist which means they can exist forever.

[f.point (OP)]

Theorem - contact number is sorted horizontally, two natural straight line provide a natural straight line

Proof -
 [ Invalid Attachment ]















- addition rule 3


(CM.) - No "addition rule 3"

[f.point (OP)]

Theorem - contact numbers, sorting is done horizontally, two natural straight lines provide a natural straight line , when there arre two (more) results between them becomes void.

Proof
 [ Invalid Attachment ]















- addition rule 4

(CM.) - No "addition rule 4"

[f.point (OP)]

Theorem - contact numbers, sorting is done horizontally, only one natural straight line a natural straight line two natural straight line provide a natural straight line



Proof -
 [ Invalid Attachment ]





















addition rule 5

(CM.) - No "addition rule 5"

[f.point (OP)]

Theorem - The contact number is sorted horizontally only be a natural straight line that gives a natural straight line , when there are two (more) results merge

Proof -
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
















- addition rule 3


(SM.) - no "addition rule 3 "


NOTE, the previous becomes , the previous becomes

[f.point (OP)]

Theorem - contact numbers, sorting is done horizontally, two natural straight lines provide a natural straight line , when there are two (more) results merge.

Proof -
 [ Invalid Attachment ]














addition rule 6


(SM.) - no "addition rule 6 "

NOTE, the previous    becomes   

[f.point (OP)]

error corrected in PDF, in Serbian language, soon will be in English

https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=700D973D1A1F1E0!148&authkey=!ADW1rlkP--a4Vsc&ithint=file%2cpdf

[f.point (OP)]

Theorem - The contact number is sorted vertically:
- Only one natural straight line gives a natural straight line
- Two natural straight line that gives a natural straight line
- When there are two (more) solution between them becomes gaps
PROOF - 
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
or

or

or

or

or

or

or

- addition rule 8


(CM.) - no addition rule 8

[f.point (OP)]

Theorem - The contact number is sorted vertically:
- Only one natural straight line gives a natural straight line
- Two natural straight line that gives a natural straight line
- when there are two (more) solutions between them, are connected
PROOF - 
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
or

or

or

or

or

or

or

- addition rule 9


(CM.) - no addition rule 9

https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=700D973D1A1F1E0!151&authkey=!AHgbe6-ioR3v_Lk&ithint=file%2cpdf

[f.point (OP)]

Theorem - The contact number is sorted vertically only one natural straight line gives a natural gaps
PROOF
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
or

or

or

or

or

- addition rule10
(CM.) - no addition rule 10

[f.point (OP)]

ERROR - in the above posts should be like this
or

or

or

or

or

Theorem - The contact number is sorted vertically only be a natural straight line that gives a natural gap
-When has two (more) solution between them becomes straights lines

PROOF -
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
or

or

or

or

or

- addition rule 11

(CM.) - no addition rule 11
' does not need a translator for the lates (on website), put these signs

[f.point (OP)]

Theorem - The contact number is sorted vertically only be a natural straight line that gives a natural gap
-When has two (more) solutions they are connected
Proof -
 [ Invalid Attachment ]

or

or

or

or

or

- addition rule 12
(CM.) - no addition rule 12

[f.point (OP)]

English language N,N

Serbian language
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Kcv3P3ZMUZ9RlSguXWvjQAybydR4rjZO/view?usp=sharing

[Bored chemist]

You say  "1 Introduction
Let?s look at the picture showing the relationship between the two lengths. the
distance is the same AB=CD, AB is a straight line, CD is empty, we cannot
describe this situation with numbers"

This is a computer.
All it has is numbers.
You just did describe this situation with a computer and therefore you just described it with numbers.
This observation invalidates your stated "theory".

It's possible that the problem is that you are still totally failing to explain what the ^*(*  you are talking about.

[f.point (OP)]

You say  "1 Introduction
Let?s look at the picture showing the relationship between the two lengths. the
distance is the same AB=CD, AB is a straight line, CD is empty, we cannot
describe this situation with numbers"

How will you show the difference with the current numbers:
- the distance between the points AB, there is a line between them
- the distance between the points CD, there is no line between them
for the distance AB(CD) the current numbers are sufficient., if I use the current numbers I cannot know if there is (is not) a line between the points.

[f.point (OP)]

adding or joining , as performed



R a+b=c same as now, combined numbers 222+33=2253, when they are the same along (gap) they are joined, here 2 and 3, we get 5

R² here there is an operation function (the same applies to other Rⁿ) , 1(R₂) 3+₁4=(3,4₂) , 2(R,R₂) 3₊₂4={7 ,(3,4₂)} , 3(R-R₂) 3+₃4= (7, 4₂₎},4(R,R₂,R-R₂) , 3+₄ 4={7,(3,4₂) , (7.4₂)}
(2,3₂)+(3.3₂)=(5 .6₂)

R³ 5(R,R₂ , R₃) , 3+₅4={7 , (3 ,4₂ ), (3 , 0 , 4₃)} , 6(R-R₂, R₃) , 3+₆4={( 7 , 4₂) , ( 3 , 0 , 4₃} , 7(R, R₂-R₃) , ...so on

[f.point (OP)]

https://www.geogebra.org/search/werto

geo gebra, proof of how to get a plane as a proof

moving the point F intersects the space, the point C changes the angle between the lines