The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. The Environment
  4. What would a smokers Carbon footprint look like?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

What would a smokers Carbon footprint look like?

  • 2 Replies
  • 16608 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline daveyroids (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
What would a smokers Carbon footprint look like?
« on: 06/11/2007 17:21:44 »
If a person smokes 20 cigarettes a day what would their carbon footprint be, just in terms of smoking, over a year?
« Last Edit: 25/03/2008 05:51:32 by Karen W. »
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: What would a smokers Carbon footprint look like?
« Reply #1 on: 06/11/2007 19:11:00 »
If it's the year they die then smoking might reduce their carbon footprint.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline techmind

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 934
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Un-obfuscated
    • techmind.org
Re: What would a smokers Carbon footprint look like?
« Reply #2 on: 10/11/2007 18:46:02 »
Quote from: daveyroids on 06/11/2007 17:21:44
If a person smokes 20 cigarettes a day what would their carbon footprint be, just in terms of smoking, over a year?
In the grand scheme of things, very little.

Cigarettes weigh roughly 1 gram each.
20g x 365 days = 7300grammes/year, or 7.3kg
Worst case that they're 100% carbon, and 100% burned, gives 7.3*((16*2)+12)/12 = 27kg CO2.

A typical British household produces around 8600kg* CO2 annually in "direct" emissions (from their domestic energy use, and car use), excluding all the energy used to grow/manufacture/transport/dispose of all the stuff they buy/eat.

You might argue that since the tobacco and paper was grown recently, that smoking should in fact be carbon-neutral. However the actual carbon footprint of smoking will of course also have to include all the effort in manufacturing, packaging, transporting, and selling the cancer-sticks... I'd hazard a guess that this is likely something like 5 times more than the direct measure.

A bigger effect is all the windows and doors the smokers keep opening, letting all the hot air out of their homes and workplaces, and all the patio-heaters they enjoy at the pubs! [;)]


* calculation from my webpage http://www.techmind.org/energy/dontbanthebulb.html - sorry it's a bit of a rant compared to my usual fayre!
« Last Edit: 10/11/2007 18:49:44 by techmind »
Logged
"It has been said that the primary function of schools is to impart enough facts to make children stop asking questions. Some, with whom the schools do not succeed, become scientists." - Schmidt-Nielsen "Memoirs of a curious scientist"
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.829 seconds with 33 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.