The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Spaghettification vs. length contraction - which one wins?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Spaghettification vs. length contraction - which one wins?

  • 2 Replies
  • 5354 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LeeE (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3382
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • Spatial
Spaghettification vs. length contraction - which one wins?
« on: 03/07/2008 14:59:27 »
YABHS (Yet Another Black Hole Scenario)

You are an observer watching an object falling into a BH.  As it accelerates it will appear to contract in length, in accordance with GR.  However, at the same time, it will start to lengthen due to spaghettification.

Does this mean that you could end up seeing an object moving at relativistic speed but with no apparent foreshortening?

Working out the foreshortening factor is easy enough but I'm not so sure about the spaghettification lengthening factor to work out if they cancel.  The fact that both phenomenom arise from the same and equal cause suggests that they might but this would seem to contradict GR.
Logged
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
 



Offline LeeE (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3382
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • Spatial
Spaghettification vs. length contraction - which one wins?
« Reply #1 on: 04/07/2008 00:55:17 »
Okay - we can postulate an immensely huge rocket (lots of fuel) that slowy approaches a BH.  It's great mass will not make it accelerate more quickly than a lighter rocket, so spaghettification would seem to dominate over foreshortening.  This isn't a free-fall siituation though - energy is being supplied and must be accounted for.
Logged
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Spaghettification vs. length contraction - which one wins?
« Reply #2 on: 04/07/2008 06:35:15 »


I dunno. I'm just a dumb rodent
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.546 seconds with 30 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.