The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Non Life Sciences
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
Spaghettification vs. length contraction - which one wins?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Spaghettification vs. length contraction - which one wins?
2 Replies
5354 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
LeeE
(OP)
Naked Science Forum King!
3382
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 3 times
Spaghettification vs. length contraction - which one wins?
«
on:
03/07/2008 14:59:27 »
YABHS (Yet Another Black Hole Scenario)
You are an observer watching an object falling into a BH. As it accelerates it will appear to contract in length, in accordance with GR. However, at the same time, it will start to lengthen due to spaghettification.
Does this mean that you could end up seeing an object moving at relativistic speed but with no apparent foreshortening?
Working out the foreshortening factor is easy enough but I'm not so sure about the spaghettification lengthening factor to work out if they cancel. The fact that both phenomenom arise from the same and equal cause suggests that they might but this would seem to contradict GR.
Logged
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
LeeE
(OP)
Naked Science Forum King!
3382
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 3 times
Spaghettification vs. length contraction - which one wins?
«
Reply #1 on:
04/07/2008 00:55:17 »
Okay - we can postulate an immensely huge rocket (lots of fuel) that slowy approaches a BH. It's great mass will not make it accelerate more quickly than a lighter rocket, so spaghettification would seem to dominate over foreshortening. This isn't a free-fall siituation though - energy is being supplied and must be accounted for.
Logged
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
DoctorBeaver
Naked Science Forum GOD!
12653
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 4 times
A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Spaghettification vs. length contraction - which one wins?
«
Reply #2 on:
04/07/2008 06:35:15 »
I dunno. I'm just a dumb rodent
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...