The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution
  4. Why Has Cassandra Not Evolved ? ( A sharky question )
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Why Has Cassandra Not Evolved ? ( A sharky question )

  • 4 Replies
  • 5528 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline neilep (OP)

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21211
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 119 times
Why Has Cassandra Not Evolved ? ( A sharky question )
« on: 26/08/2008 22:45:49 »
Dearest Peeps Who have Evolved !

See Cassandra here ?


 [ Invalid Attachment ]


Nice eh ?..now as far as Great Whites go, I hear she's one hellova babe !

Apparently, ..she's the epitome of her species as she has shown great reluctance to evolve further for the last few  zillion years !!..as a species I admire this lazy attitude to evolve further......

...but why's that then ?...why has Casandra not evolved for such a long time ?..have the oceans really not changed that much in such a long time ?

Are there any other examples of non-evolution over such a great expanse of time ? flora ? fauna ? other ?


As a  sheepy, I of course am also at the pinnacle  of my own species evolutionary ladder !!...Oy !!..I heard ewe think that !...and that !!..how rude !!


Your answers of educational gifts will be most welcome.


Hugs et les shmishes


Neil
Evolved Psychic Sheep

mwah mwah mwah mwah
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


* Great-White-shark-South-Australia.jpg (31.38 kB, 456x342 - viewed 770 times.)
Logged
Men are the same as Women, just inside out !
 



Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 163 times
Why Has Cassandra Not Evolved ? ( A sharky question )
« Reply #1 on: 27/08/2008 11:33:05 »
Quote from: neilep on 26/08/2008 22:45:49
why has Casandra not evolved for such a long time ?..have the oceans really not changed that much in such a long time ?

Deep ocean conditions have not changed for eons,  and the laws of hydrodynamics which shaped Casandra are constant.

Quote
Are there any other examples of non-evolution over such a great expanse of time ? flora ? fauna ? other ?
In this thread our not-so-tame creationist Asyncritus has been claiming coelacanths (another deep ocean fish) have not changed in 418Myr.

The phrase "non-evolution" is incorrect: evolution never stops. The form of some creatures who have become ideally adapted to a constant niche may have changed little over millions of years, but evolution has still changed them during this period, e.g. new pathogens will exert an evolutionary pressure on their immune systems. New pathogens are constantly being created by evolution. Those creatures whose immune system can defeat the new virus survive and pass on this immunity to their progeny. Those whose immune system cannot defeat the new virus perish and are an evolutionary dead-end.


So Cassandra's immune system, and possibly brain/behaviour and other systems (e.g. olfaction) will not be the same as her look-a-like fossilized ancestors: evolution has never stopped in her case, or any other species. 
Logged
 

Offline neilep (OP)

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21211
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 119 times
Why Has Cassandra Not Evolved ? ( A sharky question )
« Reply #2 on: 27/08/2008 12:43:26 »
Quote from: RD on 27/08/2008 11:33:05
Quote from: neilep on 26/08/2008 22:45:49
why has Casandra not evolved for such a long time ?..have the oceans really not changed that much in such a long time ?

Deep ocean conditions have not changed for eons,  and the laws of hydrodynamics which shaped Casandra are constant.

Quote
Are there any other examples of non-evolution over such a great expanse of time ? flora ? fauna ? other ?
In this thread our not-so-tame creationist Asyncritus has been claiming coelacanths (another deep ocean fish) have not changed in 418Myr.

The phrase "non-evolution" is incorrect: evolution never stops. The form of some creatures who have become ideally adapted to a constant niche may have changed little over millions of years, but evolution has still changed them during this period, e.g. new pathogens will exert an evolutionary pressure on their immune systems. New pathogens are constantly being created by evolution. Those creatures whose immune system can defeat the new virus survive and pass on this immunity to their progeny. Those whose immune system cannot defeat the new virus perish and are an evolutionary dead-end.


So Cassandra's immune system, and possibly brain/behaviour and other systems (e.g. olfaction) will not be the same as her look-a-like fossilized ancestors: evolution has never stopped in her case, or any other species. 


I am indebted to this wonderful information by RD.

It's also true that sharks donlt get cancer too eh ? could that be an example of inside evoloution?


Many thanks

Neil
Logged
Men are the same as Women, just inside out !
 

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 163 times
Why Has Cassandra Not Evolved ? ( A sharky question )
« Reply #3 on: 27/08/2008 13:31:40 »
Sharks do get cancer .

As our resident creationist Asyncritus has correctly pointed out,
 most genetic mutations are either destructive or neutral, only a tiny minority are beneficial
.

Cancer is one of those destructive genetic mutations, which can affect all creatures, (including sharks).
« Last Edit: 27/08/2008 13:35:02 by RD »
Logged
 

Offline neilep (OP)

  • Withdrawnmist
  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21211
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 119 times
Why Has Cassandra Not Evolved ? ( A sharky question )
« Reply #4 on: 28/08/2008 21:37:25 »
Quote from: RD on 27/08/2008 13:31:40
Sharks do get cancer .

As our resident creationist Asyncritus has correctly pointed out,
 most genetic mutations are either destructive or neutral, only a tiny minority are beneficial
.

Cancer is one of those destructive genetic mutations, which can affect all creatures, (including sharks).

Well I guess I won't be doing a Jeff Goldblum with Casandra then !!

 [ Invalid Attachment ]


All those years of planning !!..wasted !! [>:(]




* Image1.jpg (11.02 kB, 254x140 - viewed 690 times.)
Logged
Men are the same as Women, just inside out !
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.563 seconds with 36 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.