The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
That CAN'T be true!
Faked fractal resolution, right?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Faked fractal resolution, right?
1 Replies
7949 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
ceribetoriate
(OP)
First timers
6
Activity:
0%
Faked fractal resolution, right?
«
on:
13/02/2010 02:30:12 »
I'm ready to accept that fractal numbers MIGHT be truthfully illustrated like something like this. But unless it is settled that this particular rendition isn't simply FAKED to the most part, I will refuse to even try to boggle my mind with illustrations of proportions of that kind.
newbielink:http://thinkorthwim.com/2010/02/12/mathematical-porn
[nonactive]
Of course, a computation like that doesn't pop up from a source like that.
Right?
[xx(]
Logged
ceribetoriate
(OP)
First timers
6
Activity:
0%
Faked fractal resolution, right?
«
Reply #1 on:
13/02/2010 15:42:51 »
After further googling into the matter, I suppose that this sort of thing is not too uncommon, even if this degree of "perspective" might make oneself dumbfounded to the limit of, eh, whatever limit there might remain somewhere...
Anyway, what do you think about 3D fractals?
newbielink:http://www.skytopia.com/project/fractal/mandelbulb.html#renders
[nonactive]
What if this ugly Mandel-bug flied into your nostril? Sneeze hard!
[ The bloody government should do something to rid us all of them nasty fractals!
]
«
Last Edit: 13/02/2010 15:44:43 by ceribetoriate
»
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...