The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. New theories on structure or density of dark matter?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

New theories on structure or density of dark matter?

  • 4 Replies
  • 2557 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline esquire (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 85
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
New theories on structure or density of dark matter?
« on: 25/03/2019 20:03:42 »
DM doesnot oscillate, during a quantum fluctuations in space/time, a fluctuation erupts to disturb the space/time fabric. unimpeded by gravitational matter, it creates a sea of ramdom rising and falling fluctuations. the rising and falling of the random fluctuations creates a stretching of the space/time fabric. this stretching elongates space/time itself.

as the quantum fluctuations stretch space/time, the surrounding unstretched space/time doesnot stretch or oscillate, it remains static. this creates a diffential between oscillating space/time and static space/time. the dynamics of this differential equals the potential for virtual particles. the propagation of virtual particles is driven by this space/time differential.

seeing that virtual particles donot exist long enough to oscillate, they remain unseen. yet their effect is felt in the expansion of the Universe.   
Logged
 



Offline acsinuk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 643
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
    • https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php
Re: New theories on structure or density of dark matter?
« Reply #1 on: 25/03/2019 22:54:29 »
There is no such thing as dark matter.  It has never been observed so therefore is does not exist. However, there is a dark force that causes a 2 pi magnoflux spin effect which in magnetised space is 6.3 times stronger than gravity.
Logged
A.C.Stevens
 

Offline Tembo441

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: New theories on structure or density of dark matter?
« Reply #2 on: 27/03/2019 15:04:19 »
Quote from: esquire on 25/03/2019 20:03:42
as the quantum fluctuations stretch space/time, the surrounding unstretched space/time doesnot stretch or oscillate, it remains static. this creates a diffential between oscillating space/time and static space/time. the dynamics of this differential equals the potential for virtual particles. the propagation of virtual particles is driven by this space/time differential.

Can you expand on this?  I'll tell you why: with my limited knowledge but a lot of interest, the whole concept of "virtual particles" bothers me.  I completely understand that without "virtual particles" many interactions that DO happen simply couldn't happen, and yet the concept of a particle that comes into existence (apparently from nowhere?) and disappears just as rapidly and mysteriously, is difficult to grasp and to fully accept.
I wondered - in an amateurish way - whether there was yet something in the very old "ether" theories" long disproved (Michelson-Morley experiment 1887) and nowadays almost blasphemous to many scientists to refer to such a theory.  Yet, I see that Einstein referred to spacetime as "the new Ether" (1920).  Clearly the old concept of an "ether" is wrong - but, still, is there perhaps something in dark matter, or dark force... or something else(!) that might complete our understanding (more particularly, MY understanding) of an underlying structure that we are only just beginning to appreciate?

** I don't expect a definitive answer.  Discussion would be interesting.  I'd be grateful if at least some of it was in words that an amateur could understand...
Logged
 

Offline esquire (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 85
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: New theories on structure or density of dark matter?
« Reply #3 on: 27/03/2019 20:46:09 »
Quote from: Tembo441 on 27/03/2019 15:04:19
Quote from: esquire on 25/03/2019 20:03:42
as the quantum fluctuations stretch space/time, the surrounding unstretched space/time doesnot stretch or oscillate, it remains static. this creates a diffential between oscillating space/time and static space/time. the dynamics of this differential equals the potential for virtual particles. the propagation of virtual particles is driven by this space/time differential.

Can you expand on this?  I'll tell you why: with my limited knowledge but a lot of interest, the whole concept of "virtual particles" bothers me.  I completely understand that without "virtual particles" many interactions that DO happen simply couldn't happen, and yet the concept of a particle that comes into existence (apparently from nowhere?) and disappears just as rapidly and mysteriously, is difficult to grasp and to fully accept.
I wondered - in an amateurish way - whether there was yet something in the very old "ether" theories" long disproved (Michelson-Morley experiment 1887) and nowadays almost blasphemous to many scientists to refer to such a theory.  Yet, I see that Einstein referred to spacetime as "the new Ether" (1920).  Clearly the old concept of an "ether" is wrong - but, still, is there perhaps something in dark matter, or dark force... or something else(!) that might complete our understanding (more particularly, MY understanding) of an underlying structure that we are only just beginning to appreciate?

** I don't expect a definitive answer.  Discussion would be interesting.  I'd be grateful if at least some of it was in words that an amateur could understand...

apologies this is as simple a description as I can make it.

time is a 2D linear medium that is incorporated into a 3D volume to express change of distance via forward motion.  distance is a value that measures change in space. forward motion although linear does have a vertical component that is intrinsic to a 3D volume. this intrinsic vertically forward linear motion can be a result of a compressive force. force is a component of velocity. velocity is a subject to a rate of angular momentum.

the expansion of space/time in the universe is proceeding a velocity greater then the speed of light. this expansion, stretching, is not solely a function of light. it is also a function of the space/time fabric constantly undulating in a spasm of being unfolded in front of itself. as space/time transverse emptiness it brings the remnants of the big bangs primordial sub particle soup with it. these primordial sub particles constitute the basis for motion in the space/time fabric. motion produces forward linear movement in any known medium. this motion is partially responsible for the undulating quantum fluctuations. these fluctuation manifest as 3D vertically forward linear motion. in others words a spike in the space/time fabric.

the unfolding of space/time adopted a chirality as a result of it's initial angular momentum and as a result, the speed of light is limited by a righthanded particle spin that limits the speed of light to a velocity lesser then space/time's outward spiral unwinding capacity. this limiting of the speed of light produces a compressive force of successive, faster and slower waves of light across the space/time medium. when these compressive light wave interact with virgin space/time, the undulations of the quantum fluctuations increase dramatically. the increase in quantum fluctuations create a plethora of virtual "dark matter" particles. this process exists not only on the outskirts boundaries of the Universe by also in the large void regions of our Universe.


*************************************************************************************************************************************
As quantum fluctuations spike, they create a potential differential within space/time. this differential makes it possible for sub particles to create an attraction force between each other, where none was possible before. this attraction force exists for the maximum lifetime of the spike. as the quantum spike fluctuation subsides the potential for a virtual particle ceases to exist.
*************************************************************************************************************************************
Logged
 

Offline acsinuk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 643
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
    • https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php
Re: New theories on structure or density of dark matter?
« Reply #4 on: 29/03/2019 03:53:14 »
If you google" magnoflux alternative electric 3D universe", the magnoflux spin effect is hypothesized and the magnetic dark matter force that is 6.3 times stronger than gravity identified.  The stars are assumed to be electrically positively charged and thus molecules are enclosed in positron shells and appear as antimatter which results in the stars electrostatic attracting their balancing negative electron shelled planets/moons/asteroids with a dark energy electric force that is 25 times stronger than gravity. 
Logged
A.C.Stevens
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.209 seconds with 39 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.