The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Technology
  4. Are ' National Geographic channel' serious here?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Are ' National Geographic channel' serious here?

  • 4 Replies
  • 5418 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline yor_on (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 81626
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 178 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
Are ' National Geographic channel' serious here?
« on: 30/03/2009 17:02:31 »
I saw a program recently on the telly suggesting that we should build self replicating nano robots to explore the universe. The idea behind seems to be that we will imitate successful viruses etc and also get a better 'weight'/efficiency-ratio when it comes to acceleration etc. But self-replicating?
Lets see... 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024 2048 4086 .... That number will rise very fast, it seems to me, as long as there is sufficient 'raw materials'.
Logged
URGENT:  Naked Scientists website is under threat.    https://www.thenakedscientists.com/sos-cambridge-university-killing-dr-chris

"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 



Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Are ' National Geographic channel' serious here?
« Reply #1 on: 30/03/2009 17:03:55 »
What raw materials would they use?
Logged
 

Offline LeeE

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3382
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
    • Spatial
Are ' National Geographic channel' serious here?
« Reply #2 on: 30/03/2009 17:21:57 »
They're commonly known as von-Neumann machines and have turned up lots of sci-fi literature.

Have a look at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-replicating_machine
Logged
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
 

Offline Yomi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 548
  • Activity:
    0%
  • HERE IN AM TO TAKE AWAY THE NOBEL PRIZE
Are ' National Geographic channel' serious here?
« Reply #3 on: 04/04/2009 11:42:34 »
yes of  course....
Logged
MAHESH
 

Offline Don_1

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6889
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 15 times
  • A stupid comment for every occasion.
    • Knight Light Haulage
Are ' National Geographic channel' serious here?
« Reply #4 on: 04/04/2009 11:59:46 »
'self replicating nano robots to explore the universe' - I think somebody put Absynth on their cornflakes instead of milk.
Logged
If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.533 seconds with 38 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.