The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Efficient Fan
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Efficient Fan

  • 3 Replies
  • 4127 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HankRearden (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 18
  • Activity:
    0%
Efficient Fan
« on: 19/07/2009 23:18:12 »
Ok so your typical rotating fan's purpose is to move air from one spot to another, thus doing work. But at the same time, it wastes alot of energy moving the blades of the fan. Theoretically could you like the inside of the fan's cage with a ring of copper wire perpendicular to the blades, and then stick magnets on the blades, allowing the mechanical energy of the blades to also create more electricity to power itself? making the whole thing more efficient?
Logged
 



lyner

  • Guest
Efficient Fan
« Reply #1 on: 20/07/2009 12:51:48 »
WARNING :
Perpetual Motion Machine ALERT!!!!
Logged
 

Offline BenV

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1502
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
Efficient Fan
« Reply #2 on: 20/07/2009 13:03:58 »
I think what Sophie's trying to say is...

The fan would have to do extra work in order to generate the electricity, and as there would be losses involved, this would actually decrease the efficiency of the fan.

I think the only way to increase the efficiency would be to reduce losses elsewhere - less friction in the bearings, perhaps?
Logged
 

Offline techmind

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 934
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Un-obfuscated
    • techmind.org
Efficient Fan
« Reply #3 on: 20/07/2009 13:20:35 »
You can probably design better blades and cowling to reduce turbulence in the air, which would reduce losses and improve efficiency.

Indeed a generator becomes mechanically "stiffer" to turn the greater the electrical load you put on it. This is a natural effect of "conservation of energy".
You can demonstrate this with a small DC motor from a toy (such as Lego). Attach some kind of flywheel (a cardboard disc or a large Lego wheel) to the motor spindle, connect the power and let it rev up. Now disconnect the battery and it will slowly spin down. If, having disconnected the battery you now short-circuit the connections of the motor (drawing lots of electrical power) you will find the motor and flywheel stop very quickly.
Experiments like this make it very intuitive.
In fact, with one of the small grey (fast) Lego motors you can feel that it's harder just to flick/spin the motor spindle between your fingers when the electrical connections are shorted compared to when open-circuit (totally disconnected). (Be aware that the shaft rotation is "lumpy" anyway owing to the permanent magnets and small number of internal windings.)
Logged
"It has been said that the primary function of schools is to impart enough facts to make children stop asking questions. Some, with whom the schools do not succeed, become scientists." - Schmidt-Nielsen "Memoirs of a curious scientist"
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.247 seconds with 39 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.