The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Grand Unified Theory
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Grand Unified Theory

  • 25 Replies
  • 17081 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
Grand Unified Theory
« Reply #20 on: 19/01/2010 06:43:48 »
J: I think your calender is wrong.
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 



Offline Madidus_Scientia

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1451
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Grand Unified Theory
« Reply #21 on: 19/01/2010 06:46:26 »
You're just repeating yourself without answering anything.

Why don't the negative and negative and positive and positive "RESPECTIVELY" repel each other?

Also, it says your name and the date on the left side of your post already.
Logged
 

Offline jsaldea12 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 365
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Grand Unified Theory
« Reply #22 on: 19/01/2010 11:31:14 »
I repeat because it is still mis-understood.

So let me clarify: two bar magnets, lengthwise, positive side of one bar to the negative side of the other bar binds. Or sideway, the positive side and negative side of one bar to the negative aide and positive side, respectively of the other bar bind.

Such sideway and lengthwise are the ambivalent cases of bindings the moon and earth: the important thing is the positive and negative property of moon binds to the negative and to positive property, RESPECTIVELY, of earth.

All emanation of matters, from largest, re-galaxy to smallest colored quarks, have indestructible positive and negative. Even spacetime, its skein,  now conceived of composed of dark matter and dark energy which is utilized by universal gravitational fields with electro-magnetic property on which electro-magnetic light propagates. This was, also, the later change of mind of concept of aether of no less than Dr. Einstein.

When it is electro-magnetic, it is like electricity in house, with positive and negative.

On your query:" Why don,t the negative and negative and positive and positive,RESPECTIVELY, repel each other?
Positive to positive repel, negative to negative repel.Two bar magnets will tell.

Jsaldea12
1.19.10
.



 
Logged
 

Offline Madidus_Scientia

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1451
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Grand Unified Theory
« Reply #23 on: 19/01/2010 11:44:11 »
Quote from: jsaldea12 on 19/01/2010 11:31:14
I repeat because it is still mis-understood.

In your other thread, incase I misunderstood, I drew an illustration of what I thought you were trying to say here and asked if it was right. You said it was. So it is not mis-understood. Just because we're saying it can't be right doesn't mean we don't understand.

Think about it. What if there were 2 moons? Then the moons should be repelled from each other.

Quote
On your query:" Why don,t the negative and negative and positive and positive,RESPECTIVELY, repel each other?
Positive to positive repel, negative to negative repel.Two bar magnets will tell.

This is exactly what I am trying to point out to you.
« Last Edit: 19/01/2010 11:47:00 by Madidus_Scientia »
Logged
 

Offline jsaldea12 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 365
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Grand Unified Theory
« Reply #24 on: 19/01/2010 21:29:51 »
Please permit to  respond…When there are two moons and both are on same path, both will not repel one another, instead, the positive and negative property of gravitational fields of both will flexibly attract, align and bind one another. re-positive to negative, thus both moons wll be moving closer t one another and contact one another.

Here is a proof. If there several small cut-bar magnets and is thrown all into a group,  the positive flexibly binds the negative of all cut-bar pieces and bind. When negative meet negative, the cut-magnet repel and flexibly aligns the positive to negative. Sides of the pieces..

The universe is governed by such positive to negative attraction, alignment, and binding.. otherwise without such binding, there is no formation of galaxies, stars, planets.

If the moon, one moon, and earth stops moving, rotating, both will come closer to one another and will contact one another. because of stated attraction gravity.


Jsaldea12
1.20.10. 
Logged
 



Offline Madidus_Scientia

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1451
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Grand Unified Theory
« Reply #25 on: 19/01/2010 22:30:34 »
Quote
When there are two moons and both are on same path, both will not repel one another, instead, the positive and negative property of gravitational fields of both will flexibly attract, align and bind one another.

Exactly, causing one of them to become un-alligned with Earth and be repelled from Earth.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.509 seconds with 41 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.