The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
That CAN'T be true!
Lamarck more science writer than scientist?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Lamarck more science writer than scientist?
0 Replies
5293 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Jessica H
(OP)
Full Member
73
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 1 times
Lamarck more science writer than scientist?
«
on:
24/04/2010 02:36:51 »
I was just reading a book that claimed that Lamarck has been falsely given credit for the "inheritance of acquired traits" theory. (In every introductory biology text, they tell the story of how he thought giraffes stretched their necks out reaching for leaves, and he comes across as the father of this type of thinking.) But this source implies he was more of a philosopher/writer than a scientist and was just writing about the common belief at the time.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...