The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Life Sciences
Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution
How has biodiversity and biomass changed over time?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
How has biodiversity and biomass changed over time?
2 Replies
7366 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
rhlopez
Guest
How has biodiversity and biomass changed over time?
«
on:
12/07/2010 09:30:02 »
Ricardo Hernandez asked the Naked Scientists:
Hi Chris,
Excellent show!
Again one more question:
Was there more life forms before (diversity-wise - let's say in the Jurassic or before) or now we have more life forms?
What about the volume? strange question, in terms of volume was there more volume of living things on earth before or now?
Is there any pattern?
How to know?
Thanks!!
Ricardo
What do you think?
«
Last Edit: 12/07/2010 09:30:02 by _system
»
Logged
tangoblue
Sr. Member
300
Activity:
0%
RANDOMNESS RULES!!!
Best Answer
How has biodiversity and biomass changed over time?
«
Reply #1 on:
18/07/2010 03:12:59 »
I would hazzard a guess at saying there are more species now because of evolution and humans e.g with dogs. As for volume i have no idea.
Logged
echochartruse
Sr. Member
395
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 1 times
Best Answer
How has biodiversity and biomass changed over time?
«
Reply #2 on:
20/07/2010 01:51:18 »
I would say there are less species today as compared with say, yesterday. As we hear of species extinction that is happening daily.
Probably years ago was less dense, not forgetting there were wild dogs and other preditors then and a balance for food between species would have balanced out species.
Taking into account that humans control more habitats today resulting in non inhabitable regions even though the human population is rapidly growing itself, I still think there would be more species then.
Similar density now to then. Civilization rose and fell. More people now less flocks of birds and herds of wild animals.
Just my thoughts
Logged
A view with an open mind
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...