The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. saltwater fuel
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

saltwater fuel

  • 0 Replies
  • 3832 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline saltydog (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
saltwater fuel
« on: 13/09/2012 14:51:33 »
 The world, according to the first law of thermodynamics, is flat.
Take what you see in this video, create an enclosed system and use the opposing/oscillating/alternating high frequency radio waves (13.56 megahertz range) to get more than 100 times the hydrogen you see being created in this clip - all for the electricity it takes to run three 75Watt light bulbs.
Note the "3000" degree flame coming off the paper toweling that the inventor put in the test tube. The toweling barely singes when the inventor turns off the device. This means that there is a concentration gradient of gas to the extent that it's carrying the heat along with it. Acting on 100 times the amount of saltwater in that same space can only create 100 times what you see in the video. More than enough to run a combustion engine or fuel cell. But here's the thing, "3000" degree flame. Water separates into its component parts at "2000" degrees. So if you channeled the gas created to a number of "wicks" inside a rocket thruster and then injected water into the flames being created then the only possible reaction would be thrust capable of creating enough lift to leave the planet (with a large enough unit). All for the price of the kind of electricity you can generate from a car battery.
More energy out than in? You be the judge...
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.077 seconds with 27 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.