The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Is there a minimum orbital radius?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is there a minimum orbital radius?

  • 2 Replies
  • 5082 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bizerl (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 279
  • Activity:
    0%
Is there a minimum orbital radius?
« on: 07/02/2013 02:22:41 »
Is a stable orbit acheivable at any distance, or is there some fundamental reason why something really fast couldn't orbit at, say 100m of the surface of the Earth (other than the obvious buildings and terrain limitations)?
Logged
 



Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 163 times
Re: Is there a minimum orbital radius?
« Reply #1 on: 07/02/2013 02:38:54 »
Q. Is there a minimum orbital radius? 

A. Depends how solid the satellite is ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roche_limit

Even if the satellite was rigid,  when it came in contact with Earth's atmosphere it would slow down and the orbit would decay. 
« Last Edit: 07/02/2013 02:48:52 by RD »
Logged
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11035
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Is there a minimum orbital radius?
« Reply #2 on: 07/02/2013 08:17:30 »
Assuming the satellite is made out of metal (so it is not subject to the Roche limit), and there is no atmosphere (eg the moon), the only limit on altitude is the accuracy of the orbit insertion, and the height of the mountains.

The twin GRAIL spacecraft mapped the Moon's gravitational field from the very low altitude of 50km. This height was chosen because it let them communicate results back to Mission Control on Earth on a regular schedule. Apart from this communications requirement, they could have orbited lower.

http://moon.mit.edu/design.html
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.704 seconds with 35 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.